2015
DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2015.1044152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Challenge of Normative Influences for Program Design for Youth in Detention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitative studies have explored the experiences of youth justice staff working with and providing services for detained young people. These have explored themes of race and the overrepresentation of minority populations (Conley, 1994; Holley and VanVleet, 2008), behaviour management and perceptions of differences in gender (Baines and Alder, 1996), sexual diversity (Feinstein et al, 2000), general practice and work culture (Field, 2007), and injury prevention for detained young people (Reed et al, 2015). Health and mental health services have received attention (Knowles et al, 2012; Kumwenda et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative studies have explored the experiences of youth justice staff working with and providing services for detained young people. These have explored themes of race and the overrepresentation of minority populations (Conley, 1994; Holley and VanVleet, 2008), behaviour management and perceptions of differences in gender (Baines and Alder, 1996), sexual diversity (Feinstein et al, 2000), general practice and work culture (Field, 2007), and injury prevention for detained young people (Reed et al, 2015). Health and mental health services have received attention (Knowles et al, 2012; Kumwenda et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on juvenile conduct in detention centers finds that subjective norms emerge as the strongest predictor of youth’s intended behavior (Reed et al., 2015). In other words, interpersonal relationships with institutional peers and family significantly affected the type of behavior in which juveniles engaged (Reed et al., 2015). Using the recent work of Anderson (2018) and Butler (2019), one can also argue that increased instrumental and expressive/emotional social support from in-prison networks (e.g., other incarcerated individuals, correctional staff) and out-of-prison networks (e.g., family, friends) while engaged in entrepreneurial programming should improve not only institutional behavior, but post-prison outcomes as well.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Propositionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective norms are formed from the individual's beliefs about whether people close to him or her think he or she should engage in the behavior (Conner & Armitage, 1998). Research on juvenile conduct in detention centers finds that subjective norms emerge as the strongest predictor of youth's intended behavior (Reed et al, 2015). In other words, interpersonal relationships with institutional peers and family significantly affected the type of behavior in which juveniles engaged (Reed et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theory On Planned Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%