2012
DOI: 10.1080/07438141.2012.697978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of self-enhancement bias for educational programs designed to encourage natural shorelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of norms, respondents believed that other boaters and anglers were less likely to comply with AIS rules than themselves. This result is consistent with other research that has found individuals tend to underestimate their own contribution to environmental risks, relative to their estimation of others' contributions (Amato, Shaw, & Haack, 2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In terms of norms, respondents believed that other boaters and anglers were less likely to comply with AIS rules than themselves. This result is consistent with other research that has found individuals tend to underestimate their own contribution to environmental risks, relative to their estimation of others' contributions (Amato, Shaw, & Haack, 2012).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The need for broad-based popular support has been noted in watershed planning case studies from both developed and developing countries (Sharma and Wagley 1996, Horton 2003, Moran and Woods 2008. Insights from social science can provide valuable recommendations for increasing that support and participation in outreach programs to protect lakes (Shaw et al 2011, 2012, Amato et al 2012. Better understanding of how individuals make decisions about their shoreline property could lead to better communication and greater cooperation between private land owners and the agencies and organizations working to protect our shared water resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One simple act that can improve buffer quality is to refrain from excessive mowing or cutting. For many properties around residential lakes, the state of shoreline vegetation is a direct result of actions or decisions by the property owner (Amato et al 2012). Many other factors also have an impact, such as region, lake type, parcel size, soil characteristics, and state at initial time of purchase, to name just a few.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One cost-effective way to improve degraded lakes is riparian buffers (Amato, Shaw, & Haack, 2012; Kramer et al, 2006). To accomplish this goal, one approach used by county land and conservation departments and other stakeholder groups focused on protecting lakes is to subsidize or discount the costs of restoring plants that lakeshore property owners can use to reestablish native vegetation in more highly developed areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, previous researchers suggest that the way in which coupons are framed may impact the rates in which they are redeemed (Yin & Dubinsky, 2004). However, little research to date has explored how to increase lakeshore property owners’ participation in programs designed to increase natural foliage along the lake’s edge to provide new wildlife habitat and protect water quality (for an exception see Amato, Shaw, & Haack, 2012). Drawing from the fields of social marketing and behavioral economics, this study explores which communication strategies might be more effective in pursuing these aims.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%