2018
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge with systematic reviews of non‐randomised studies in urology

Abstract: Editorialrecurrence-free or overall survival, which are other outcomes of potentially greater patient importance.Understanding the inherent limitations of NRS, and placing their findings into appropriate clinical context are critical to the conduct of SRs. Moving forward, BJU International will continue to seek out the highest quality reviews that make use of the best, up-to-date methodology. We hope that these efforts will both serve as a beacon for the research community, but more importantly, result in impr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance