Research on person perception typically emphasizes cognitive processes of information selection and interpretation within the individual perceiver and the nature of the resulting mental representations. The authors focus instead on the ways person perception processes create, and are influenced by, the patterns of impressions that are socially constructed, transmitted, and filtered through social networks. As the socially situated cognition perspective (E. R. Smith & G. R. Semin, 2004) suggests, it is necessary to supplement consideration of intra-individual cognitive processes with an examination of the social context. The authors describe a theoretical model of processes of distributed social cognition that takes account of 3 levels: the individual perceiver, the interacting dyad, and the social network in which they are embedded. The authors' model assumes that perceivers elicit or create as well as interpret impressionrelevant information in dyadic interaction and that perceivers obtain information from 3rd-party sources who are linked to perceivers and targets in social networks. The authors also present results of a multiagent simulation of a subset of these processes. Implications of the theoretical model are discussed, for the possibility of correcting biases in person perception and for the nature of underlying mental representations of persons.Keywords: person perception, gossip, social networks, multiagent People's impressions or mental representations of others are fundamental tools for social life. Whether they are valid or invalid, based on years of acquaintanceship or just a cursory glance, our impressions of other people shape our choices of romantic partners, our judgments about political candidates or job applicants, our detection and sanctioning of cheaters and norm violators, and our daily interactions with colleagues, friends, and family.Motivated by the fundamental importance of person perception, researchers have intensively studied how individual perceivers select, interpret, and integrate information about other people. We know a good deal, for instance, about the types of cues social perceivers notice and integrate into their impressions, the conditions under which they automatically access their existing knowledge structures (such as stereotypes), and the ways they use their impressions to make judgments and decisions about other people (Gilbert, 1998;E. R. Smith, 1998). Rigorously controlled laboratory studies have given a clear picture of the nature, time course, and effects of these and other subprocesses of impression formation.However, as advocates of the "situated cognition" approach have argued, even a detailed understanding of the properties of isolated psychological processes cannot fully account for the ways the processes actually operate in concrete social contexts (Robbins & Aydede, 2008;E. R. Smith & Semin, 2004). When people act and interact with other individuals and groups, additional processes often become relevant, and psychological processes are often "scaffolded" b...