2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Change in Posterior Tibial Slope After Cementless Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Migration and subsidence regarding the tibial component of UKR has been the topic of many previous studies. The current literature supports the view that early postoperative subsidence, especially in cementless cases, is acceptable and may be inevitable in the first months [9,10]. This subsidence, which is both on the coronal and sagittal plane, tends to stop or diminish in the years following surgery, and in cementless cases, it is widely believed to be due to the bedding-in phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Migration and subsidence regarding the tibial component of UKR has been the topic of many previous studies. The current literature supports the view that early postoperative subsidence, especially in cementless cases, is acceptable and may be inevitable in the first months [9,10]. This subsidence, which is both on the coronal and sagittal plane, tends to stop or diminish in the years following surgery, and in cementless cases, it is widely believed to be due to the bedding-in phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Migration and subsidence with regard to the tibial component of UKR, whether cemented or cementless, is a well-known phenomenon that has been reported since the emergence of the first implant designs [6]. Often leading to premature revisions, especially in cemented cases [7,8], migration and subsidence patterns have been previously described in the literature [9,10]. The general consensus is that the component tends to subside more in the early postoperative months and then remain stable with good results in the long term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The radiographic evaluation revealed no significant changes in implant position within the FU (Table 3 ), which is in contrast to cementless unicondylar knee arthroplasty, where changes in the posterior tibial slope over time are reported [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical treatments such as high tibial osteotomy (HTO) or unicondylar (UKA) and total (TKA) knee arthroplasty can change the TS and have an impact on knee biomechanics [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Recent studies have even shown a relationship between the TS and injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%