1966
DOI: 10.1177/004051756603600808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Changes in Fiber-Number Length Distribution Under Various Breakage Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sir: In a recent article Wronski (1967) derives several equations which relate to work we have either published or have in press (Pittman and Tallant, 1968; Tallant and Pittman, 1968;Tallant et al, 1966Tallant et al, , 1968, dealing with fiber breakage, clamping techniques, and hooks. These equations seem to be valid for breakage of bulk samples of fibers, but when the clamping procedure described by Wronski is applied, the equations need modification because the probability exists that the longer the fiber the more likely it is to be clampedthat is, when a strand of fibers is randomly clamped and the loose fibers are removed, the number distribution of the fibers clamped is the weight distribution of the fibers in the strand (see especially Equations 22 and 23 of Tallant and Pittman, 1968).…”
Section: Methods For Measuring Fiber Length Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sir: In a recent article Wronski (1967) derives several equations which relate to work we have either published or have in press (Pittman and Tallant, 1968; Tallant and Pittman, 1968;Tallant et al, 1966Tallant et al, , 1968, dealing with fiber breakage, clamping techniques, and hooks. These equations seem to be valid for breakage of bulk samples of fibers, but when the clamping procedure described by Wronski is applied, the equations need modification because the probability exists that the longer the fiber the more likely it is to be clampedthat is, when a strand of fibers is randomly clamped and the loose fibers are removed, the number distribution of the fibers clamped is the weight distribution of the fibers in the strand (see especially Equations 22 and 23 of Tallant and Pittman, 1968).…”
Section: Methods For Measuring Fiber Length Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have tried to figure out why fiber length changes and have proposed numerous models to solve the problem. Previously, various researchers (Goren, 1968;Sung Won, 1967;Tallant, 1966) discussed fiber breakage and attempted to explain it using various models. After a few years, Robert and his coworkers investigated the relationship between cotton cleanliness and fiber breakage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiber length is one of the most crucial fiber characteristics (Cai, 2013; Kuang & Yu, 2015;Lin, 2012;Morais, 2020;Parsi, 2016), influencing the spinning limit (Faulkner, 2012), yarn strength (Fiori, 1954;Naylor, 2014;Ramey , 1977), yarn evenness and product handle (Frydrych, 1995;Ibrahim, 2018;Moon Won Suh, 1976), yarn hairiness (Barella & Manich, 2002;Informa, 2009;Matsuo, 2019;Pillay, 1964;Viswanathan , 1989), process performance, and spinning efficiency (Waters, 1966). However, the length of the fiber changes during the spinning process as it is subjected to various mechanical actions in various machines (Byatt, W. J., and Elting, 1958;Byatt, 1961;Carnaby, 1984;Goren, 1968;Lee, 1968; RA Pittman and JD Tallant, 1990;Shapiro, 1964;Sung Won, 1967;Tallant, 1966;Tallant & Pittman, 1968) that affect the yarn quality as well as the end product generated from the yarn. An examination was carried out in this study to assess fiber length change throughout various stages of ring spinning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a fiber group of any particular length from a given fiber population, (1) what is the probability that a fiber of the group breaks at all and (2) what is the probability that a fiber of the group breaks into s segments (s >_ 2)? All the existing models by previous workers [1,5,6,8] are not appropriate to clarify such basic questions due. to the different approaches to the problem or the assumptions of linear probability of fiber breakage with respect to fiber length and two segment breakage per breaking fiber.…”
Section: Some Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%