The Changing Approach to the Text: Iranian scholars and the Quran

Amirpur, Katajun

doi:10.1080/00263200500105901

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis of each of those positions is based on the mental abilities of the jurist undertaking the analysis. The jurists then consider each of those positions in light of the authentic texts from the traditions of the Prophets (PBUH) and his family (Amirpur, 2005). This method is called Tafsir Mauzui or Exegesis Topica.…”

Section: A Al-sadr's Exegesis Topics Of Quranmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kur'an-ı Kerim Tefsiri Temelinde Evrensel Hukukun Kur'anî Prensipleri

Genç

Syed

2019

Bilimname

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Islamic study of law is based on the four sources of law. The Quran is the primary source of Islamic law. The Sunnah or the life of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Hım) is the secondary source of Islamic law. The Quranic states, Indeed in the Messenger of Allah (Muhammad PBUH) you have a good example to follow (Quran Al Ahzab 33:21). The Ijtihad (reasoning) and Ijma (consensus of the juristic opinions) are the tertiary sources of Islamic Law.

show abstract

Section: A Al-sadr's Exegesis Topics Of Quranmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kur'an-ı Kerim Tefsiri Temelinde Evrensel Hukukun Kur'anî Prensipleri

Genç

Syed

2019

Bilimname

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Intra-Quranic connections in Sunni and Shi‘i tafsirs: a meeting point or another area of contestation?

Rohman

2013

Indonesian J. Islam Muslim Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study seeks to shed light on how a celebrated interpretive approach to the Quran considered to be most objective is taken by interpreters from different theological settings. It takes a closer look at how the principle of tafsi> r al-Qur'a> n bi al-Qur'a> n (interpretation of the Quran by the Quran) is employed by al-Shanqiti in his Ad} wa> ' al-Baya> n and al-Tabataba'i in his al-Mi> za> n, taking their interpretation of ahl al-bayt as a main case in point. Noticing how their differences in this issue can be associated with their respective Sunni and Shi'i backgrounds, this study finds a number of areas where both modern exegetes -and other exegetes most likely -might be influenced by any creeping theological preference in their pursuit of objectivity and openness to the text.Kajian ini bermaksud menelaah bagaimana sebuah pendekatan penafsiran alQur'an yang dianggap paling objektif diterapkan oleh para mufasir dari latar belakang aliran teologi yang berbeda. Bagaimana prinsip menafsirkan al-Qur'an dengan al-Qur'an diaplikasikan oleh al-Shanqiti dalam tafsirnya, Ad} wa> ' al-Baya> n, dan al-Tabataba'i dalam tafsirnya, al-Mi> za> n, dilihat lebih saksama terutama dengan mengambil contoh penafsiran mereka tentang ahlulbait. Mencermati bagaimana IJIMS, Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, Volume 3, Number 1, June 2013: 73-95 74 perbedaan mereka dalam menafsirkan cakupan ahlul bait bisa dikaitkan dengan latar belakang Sunni dan Syiah mereka, kajian ini menemukan sejumlah ranah di mana kedua mufasir modern ini -dan sepertinya juga mufasir yang lain -bisa saja dipengaruhi oleh kecenderungan teologis ketika mencoba menjaga objektivitas dan keterbukaan terhadap teks al-Qur'an.

show abstract

Contextualist Approaches and the Interpretation of the Qur’ān

Saeed

Akbar

2021

Religions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When it comes to the interpretation of ethico-legal texts in the Qur’ān, there is usually a high degree of emphasis on literalism and textualism but not enough focus on contextualization. This is true for both the classical period and the modern period. This article points to the contextual nature of interpretation and how the contextualist approach to interpreting the Qur’ān can enable Muslims to follow its ethical teachings in accordance with contemporary needs and circumstances, without sacrificing fundamental Qur’ānic values. In order to do so, the article refers to Qur’ānic passages related to freedom of religion and the laws of punishment, and explores how a contextualist approach to interpreting such passages may yield results different from those of a textualist or literalist approach.

show abstract

The Changing Approach to the Text: Iranian scholars and the Quran

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Kur'an-ı Kerim Tefsiri Temelinde Evrensel Hukukun Kur'anî Prensipleri

Kur'an-ı Kerim Tefsiri Temelinde Evrensel Hukukun Kur'anî Prensipleri

Intra-Quranic connections in Sunni and Shi‘i tafsirs: a meeting point or another area of contestation?

Contextualist Approaches and the Interpretation of the Qur’ān

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About