2016
DOI: 10.1111/joim.12478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The changing circumstance of atrial fibrillation ‐ progress towards precision medicine

Abstract: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the general population is between 1% and 2% in the developed world and is higher in men than in women. The arrhythmia occurs much more commonly in the elderly, and the estimated lifetime risk of developing AF is one in four for men and women aged 40 years and above. Projected data from multiple population-based studies in the USA and Europe predict a two-to threefold increase in the number of AF patients by 2060. The high lifetime risk of AF and increased longevity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…83,84 However, to date, none have been found to be sufficiently useful and practical to warrant adoption in influencing clinical decision-making. 85 In patients with a history AF, the combination of AF duration and CHADS 2 score was predictive of ischaemic TEs. 86,87 …”
Section: Implications Of Study Findings On Atrial High-rate Episodes mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…83,84 However, to date, none have been found to be sufficiently useful and practical to warrant adoption in influencing clinical decision-making. 85 In patients with a history AF, the combination of AF duration and CHADS 2 score was predictive of ischaemic TEs. 86,87 …”
Section: Implications Of Study Findings On Atrial High-rate Episodes mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The risk of stroke is independent of the type of AF (paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent). 30 For patients with haemorrhagic diathesis or receiving anticoagulants for preexisting cardiovascular disease, evaluation of the haemorrhagic risk can be assessed by using HAS-BLED, ATRIA, or HEMOR 2 RHAGES scores despite their limitations. 31 There is no formal justification to avoid anticoagulation according to HAS-BLED score ( Table 2).…”
Section: Clinical Evaluation At Baselinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tremendous development of AF ablation widened this gap even more and created a hypothetical competition between interventional and pharmacological rhythm control strategies. However, it is more than obvious that catheter ablation alone cannot be applied to the 33 million patients with AF expected in the next ten years [ 6 , 7 ], if we take into account the limited availability of specialized human resources, the very large costs, eminent procedure limitations, and contraindications or patient's preferences. Also, as demonstrated by a contemporary European registry, the ablation success is increased by AAD reinforcement therapy [ 8 ] from 63% to 83% and the residual AF risk remains high after ablation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%