2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The changing food environment and neighborhood prevalence of type 2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diabetes has emerged as a rapidly rising global health issue in the 21st century [ 1 , 2 ]. Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), representing approximately 85 to 90% of the total population, has increased in prevalence from 4.5% in 1990 to 8.5% from 2016 to 2017 and is projected to rise further by 2030 [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diabetes has emerged as a rapidly rising global health issue in the 21st century [ 1 , 2 ]. Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), representing approximately 85 to 90% of the total population, has increased in prevalence from 4.5% in 1990 to 8.5% from 2016 to 2017 and is projected to rise further by 2030 [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, people who reside in an area with a high availability of ultra-processed food and an absence of fruit and vegetables are more likely to become overweight [4]. Neighborhoods characterized by a growing number or a high proportion of fast-food outlets may contribute to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [5] and hypertension [6] in residents. Access to full-service restaurants was found to be significantly associated with a lower prevalence of diabetes [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable studies have been conducted on RFE, and the researchers come from a variety of fields, mainly including public health, health geography, and urban planning. They concentrated on the RFE neighborhood disparities [8] [9], the associations between RFE and diet-related outcomes [4] [5] [6] [10], food environment assessment methods [11] [12] and secondary data validity [9] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]. These practical studies primarily from developed countries such as Canada [6] [11] [13], the United States [5] [17] [18], the United Kingdom [19] [20], and Spain [21], whereas developing countries contributed relatively limited experience and knowledge of RFE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation