1986
DOI: 10.1210/jcem-63-3-792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Changing Ratio of Serum Bioactive to Immunoreactive Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Normal Men Following Treatment With a Potent Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist

Abstract: Using a recently developed granulosa cell aromatase bioassay (GAB), we measured serum bioactive follicle-stimulating hormone (bio-FSH) levels in 5 normal men after administration of a potent GnRH antagonist. Although only minimal suppression of immunoreactive FSH (immuno-FSH) was detected during administration of 20 mg of the antagonist, [N-Ac-D-Nal(2)1,D-pCl-Phe2,D-Trp3,D-h(Arg(Et2)6,D-Ala10]GnRH , pronounced inhibition (79 to 89%) of bio-FSH levels occurred. Concomitantly, the ratio of bio- to immuno-FSH lev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrepancies in FSH B/I ratios were also reported in pituitaries of rats under many endocrine states using in vivo and in vitro FSH bioassays (Diebel et al, 1973;Muchopadhyay et al, 1979;Chappel et al, 1983a;Chappel and Ramaley, 1985). Recently, FSH bioactivities in human serum have been analyzed with the present cultured granulosa cell assay (Dahl et al, 1986(Dahl et al, , 1987aTenover et al, 1987), or a cultured Sertoli cell assay (Padmanabhan et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discrepancies in FSH B/I ratios were also reported in pituitaries of rats under many endocrine states using in vivo and in vitro FSH bioassays (Diebel et al, 1973;Muchopadhyay et al, 1979;Chappel et al, 1983a;Chappel and Ramaley, 1985). Recently, FSH bioactivities in human serum have been analyzed with the present cultured granulosa cell assay (Dahl et al, 1986(Dahl et al, , 1987aTenover et al, 1987), or a cultured Sertoli cell assay (Padmanabhan et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Due to the lack of a sensitive and specific bioassay for FSH, no studies have measured serum bioactive FSH (bio-FSH) levels or compared ratios of bioactive to immunoreactive FSH (B/I) in prepubertal rats. Recently, a sensitive in vitro granulosa cell aromatase (GAB) bioassay for FSH was developed (Jia and Hsueh, 1985;Jia et al, 1986) and has proven useful in studying bioactive FSH levels of humans and gorillas in various endocrine states (Dahl et al, 1986(Dahl et al, , 1987a. The present study utilized the GAB assay to determine the bioactive FSH profiles in male and female rats from birth to Day 40 of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the differing degrees of suppression of LH and FSH may arise as a result of differential suppression of bioactive vs. immunoactive hormone by the antagonist. Bioactive FSH concentrations, determined by a granulosa cell aromatase bioassay (27), declined to a greater degree than immunoactive FSH in men receiving detirelix (28) and in hypogonadal women and women in the midfollicular phase receiving the 4F antagonist (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These observations support the contention that FSH secretion may be less dependent on GnRH than LH, utilizing evidence that GnRH antagonists in vivo lower serum LH more than FSH, whether given to gonadectomized rats or intact rats at metestrus and proestrus [23,24]. In dispersed cell cultures the effect of Antag on LH and FSH is equal when given against a back ground of GnRH stimulation [8], but others have seen discre pancies using pituitary fragments [10], A GnRH antagonist si milar to the one used in the present experiments causes a drop in bioassayable FSH when given to male patients [25], while immunoassayable FSH shows the minor drop we have seen in rats [8,23]. Since we did not measure bioassayable FSH we do not know whether the differences in FSH:LH ratios seen in this study as a function of Antag are partly due to failure of the RIA to pick up changes in bioactive FSH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%