1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb01549.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Changing Role of Government in Community Services: Issues of Access and Equity to Administrative Review

Abstract: Governments are increasingly moving to privatise, or contract out many community services and functions previously the responsibility of the public sector. Consumers of community services stand to benefit from this trend toward contracting out. However, it is also apparent that there is a need to ensure that improved avenues of review, redress and safeguards accompany these changes in delivery and decision making.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Government has privatised, corporatised and contracted out many services and functions previously the responsibility of the public sector while simultaneously importing from the private sector practices aimed at efficiency and 'value for money' (Tang 1997). The resulting fluidity between the public and the private sector challenges traditional constitutional classifications of what has been thought of as governmental, raising questions over the applicability of administrative law and other public sector accountability mechanisms to decisions of administrators (Allars 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Government has privatised, corporatised and contracted out many services and functions previously the responsibility of the public sector while simultaneously importing from the private sector practices aimed at efficiency and 'value for money' (Tang 1997). The resulting fluidity between the public and the private sector challenges traditional constitutional classifications of what has been thought of as governmental, raising questions over the applicability of administrative law and other public sector accountability mechanisms to decisions of administrators (Allars 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%