The Changing Role of Urban Heritage: Governance and Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Turkey and the United Arab Emirates

YILDIRIM, Ayşe

doi:10.4305/metu.jfa.2015.1.7

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(5) Based on the grading results, the conservation principles of each level are formulated at the strategic level of conservation [39]. A set of selected criteria and value evaluation system will be established as the basis to determine the graded conservation measures and programs for historic buildings and propose conservation strategies for different levels.…”

Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the evaluation of historical building values based on historic building mapping

Lin

Yuxi

2022

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Historic buildings carry the history of human civilisation, and their conservation and utilisation are widely valued by countries around the world. At present, the lack of qualitative and quantitative assessment and evaluation methods for the preservation status and attachment value of historic buildings poses a challenge to the smooth implementation of the conservation and utilisation of historic buildings. The development of a set of system standards for the assessment and evaluation of historic buildings is an urgent task for the conservation and utilisation of historic buildings. This paper proposes a set of comprehensive mapping assessment and evaluation system for historical buildings through the analysis and sorting out of the current situation of preserving historical buildings and their development lineage, architectural style, building type, society and art. Finally, based on the above mapping evaluation system, 20 historical buildings are graded according to the requirements of historical building classification, and according to the different levels. Corresponding conservation measures are proposed and different planning schemes are formulated to better utilise the historical, scientific, cultural and economic values of historical buildings.

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the evaluation of historical building values based on historic building mapping

Lin

Yuxi

2022

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dragouni & Fouseki (2018) further this analysis in their study of Kastoria, Greece, by explaining the 'heritage values' held by destination stakeholders. They explain that values ascribed to heritage by communities can have an impact on what is possible when making decisions about tourism development, a view echoed by Yildirim (2015) in a comparative study of the challenges of sustainable urban heritage management between Turkey and the United Arab Emirates. Ripp et al (2011) insist that, for sustainable management in urban heritage destinations, the views of all stakeholders must be incorporated into local governance and development frameworks.…”

Section: Contextual Factors Affecting the Smart Governance Of Heritage Tourism Destinationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart governance for heritage tourism destinations: Contextual factors and destination management organization perspectives

Mandić

Kennell

2021

Tourism Management Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The sustainable development of tourism is a major concern for destination management organisations (DMOs) in heritage tourism. Smart tourism advocates claim that technologicallydriven innovations can help DMOs to optimise tourism development by addressing issues such as carrying capacity, stakeholder management and community involvement. This study enhances the understanding of smart tourism governance (SG), showing how contextual factors affect DMO perspectives of SG. A mixed-methods approach was used to investigate heritage tourism destinations in the United Kingdom. The results demonstrate that well-established DMOs do not perceive SG as potentially beneficial, as they already perform well in many areas in which SG promises improvements, such as citizen engagement, decision-making, and stakeholder engagement. Despite this, this research highlights the aspects of SG that these destinations can take advantage of as social inclusion, environmental performance and the provision of citizen-centric services. All of these can help heritage tourism destinations to optimise their tourism development. This research additionally demonstrates the effect of contextual factors, such as the level of public-sector support for tourism and the growing influence of non-tourism stakeholders in destination management, on DMO perceptions of SG and makes recommendations for how developments in the use of SG by DMOs can be made, in light of these.

show abstract

“…"Tarihi alanlara yönelik gereklilikler olan; bütüncül/bütünleşik bakışla alan yönetimi/koruması (Meşhur, 1999;Pickard, 2002;Güler ve Ekinci, 2010) ve bu bütüncül yaklaşımın yapılı çevre (somut) ve kültürel (somut olmayan) varlıkların etkileşimlerine dayanması (Karakul, 2011;O' Sullivan, 2013); ⮚ Alan kullanıcıları ve tüm kentlilerin yararını gözetecek (Altınörs Çırak, 2010) katılımcı tekniklerin (Yılmaz, 2005;Gürler, 2005;Başaran Uysal, 2013) ve çoğulcu planlama yaklaşımlarının (Akay ve Eroğlu, 1979) kullanımı; ⮚ Uzlaşma, sosyal ve ekonomik boyutlar (Gürler, 2005;Yıldırım, 2015) ile mekânın toplumsal, kültürel ve psikolojik değerlerinin (Altınörs Çırak, 2010) korumaya entegrasyonu; ⮚ Tarihi kentlerde; tarih, kültür, sosyal ve ekonomik boyutları bir arada ele alan (Akay ve Eroğlu, 1979;Kuban, 1984;Mazı, 2009;Akkar Ercan, 2010;Aysev Deneç; ve yaşam standartlarını sürdürmeyi/iyileştirmeyi hedefleyen, koruma ve -yeniden canlandırmanın (Oruç, 2005) birlikteliği temeline dayanan kentsel yenileşme (Ağartan, 2007) ve sürdürülebilir kentsel yeniden yapılanma, korumada kentsel tasarım (Meşhur, 1999;Gürler, 2005;Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia, 2007;Tunçer, 2009) gibi yeni yaklaşımların benimsenmesi ve ⮚ Konumsal/coğrafi bilgi sistemlerinin (Elkadi ve Pendlebury, 2001;Özen ve Kadıoğulları, 2006), internet tabanlı sayısal kültür envanterlerinin (Sürül vd., 2003) ve koruma uygulamaların kavramsal altyapısının (Altınörs Çırak, 2010) oluşturulması." biçiminde özetlemiştir.…”

unclassified

Kentsel Kimlik Bağlamında Toplumsal Kültürel Mekânsal Dönüşüm: Kayseri Tavukçu Mahallesi Örneği

Baş Kalabay,

Demir Kayan

2024

Kent Akademisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bu çalışmanın ana konusu tarih boyunca Anadolu’da pek çok kültür ve medeniyetin odak noktası olan ve Hristiyanlık için önemli merkezlerden biri olma özelliği taşıyan Kayseri kentine bağlı Tavukçu Mahallesi’nin kentsel kimlik bağlamında toplumsal, kültürel ve mekânsal dönüşümüdür. Çalışma kapsamında dünyadan ve Türkiye’den Tavukçu Mahallesi ile benzer özelliklere sahip alanlarda gerçekleşen ve başarılı olan dönüşüm çalışmaları incelenmiştir. Ayrıca alanda 2003 yılından beri devam eden dönüşüm çalışmalarına aktif olarak katılmış; mimar, sanat tarihçisi ve restoratör olan 4 uzman ve alanın dış çeperinde uzun yıllardır faaliyet gösteren beş esnafla derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular Tavukçu Mahallesi’nin geçirdiği süreç içinde kentsel kimliğini kaybettiğini ve mahallede gerçekleştirilen dönüşüm çalışmalarının başarısız olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışmada dönüşümün başarısız olmasının arkasındaki etkenler sorgulanmış ve kentsel sit alanlarında yapılan çalışmaların başarılı olmasının, çalışmalar başlamadan önce alan analizinin yapılması, alanın çevresiyle beraber ele alınması ve kullanıcıların istek/önerilerinin dikkate alınmasına bağlı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

show abstract

The Changing Role of Urban Heritage: Governance and Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Turkey and the United Arab Emirates

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Research on the evaluation of historical building values based on historic building mapping

Research on the evaluation of historical building values based on historic building mapping

Smart governance for heritage tourism destinations: Contextual factors and destination management organization perspectives

Kentsel Kimlik Bağlamında Toplumsal Kültürel Mekânsal Dönüşüm: Kayseri Tavukçu Mahallesi Örneği

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About