2021
DOI: 10.22452/ijie.vol13no4.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Changing Spousal Differentials in Socio-demographic Characteristics in Malaysia

Abstract: This paper uses matched couple data from the 1991, 2000, and 2010 population censuses to examine the changes in spousal differentials in age, education, and work status, as well as inter-ethnic and international marriages. The general trend is one of decreasing spousal age and educational gaps between 1991 and 2010. Although older-man younger-woman marriages still predominated, the spousal age gap decreased from 4.6 years to 3.9 years, and the proportion of marriages in which the husband was more than 6 years … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2014 Malaysian Population and Family Survey showed that the CPR of Malays (all of whom are Muslims) was slightly lower than the Chinese and other indigenous groups -50.6% versus 62.0% and 55.2% (Tey, 2020). There is a continuing faith among some rural Malays that FP is prohibited entirely in Islam (International Planned Parenthood Federation [IPPF], as cited by Center for Reproductive Rights & Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2014 Malaysian Population and Family Survey showed that the CPR of Malays (all of whom are Muslims) was slightly lower than the Chinese and other indigenous groups -50.6% versus 62.0% and 55.2% (Tey, 2020). There is a continuing faith among some rural Malays that FP is prohibited entirely in Islam (International Planned Parenthood Federation [IPPF], as cited by Center for Reproductive Rights & Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%