('FLA'). This thesis examines the nature and impact of the amendment to the child voice provisions of ascertaining the child's 'views' provided in section 60CC(3)(a), rather than the consideration of a child's 'wishes' as formerly required in section 68F(2)(a) FLA. The amendment to consider the child's view was intended by the legislature to broaden the scope of the requirement to listen to children by taking into account the child's perceptions and feelings about the matter, moving beyond a simpler and more crude requirement to seek the child's wish about who they would prefer to live with.Consideration of a child's views in determining custody arrangements represents one of the factors related to the central concept of the best interests of the child, which must be considered by the court. This requirement clearly is an important part of the judicial reasoning process in determining the outcomes in these cases and the change in the legislative framework from the court's requirement that they must consider a child's view -as opposed to their wishes -provides the central context explored by this thesis.The amendments produced several important questions for law and practice regarding the (1) to consider whether the FLASPRA amendment to the FLA section 60CC (3)(a) rendered the consideration of a child's view different from a wish in a technical legal sense;(2) to explore the opinions of ICLs and Judges about what they consider their respective role is in ascertaining a child's view compared with a child's wish using a qualitative study; and (3) to explore the practices of ICLs and Judges in speaking to a child in the context of ascertaining a child's view compared with a child's wish using a qualitative study.
Research methods and key findings.
Conclusion.This thesis contributes to knowledge by analysing the meaning of the Family Law Act provision about obtaining a child's views compared to a child's wishes and its interpretation by the courts. It also contributes to professional knowledge and practice by an innovative qualitative study which has yielded rich insights into professionals' opinions and actual practice in relation to this important Family Law provision.The doctrinal research conclusions, supported by the qualitative study concluded that a view is not different from a wish in law, meaning, weight or in practice. The doctrinal research conclusions were that although the legislature intended that in meaning a view was different to a wish, the majority of judicial decisions post-2006 did not support this. The qualitative study also concluded that in the opinion of the majority of Judges and ICLs a view was not different from a wish and the majority of Judges and ICLs did not change the way they practiced in ascertaining the child's voice, whether it was described as a wish or a view.The thesis makes recommendations for amendments to the FLA including the inserting of a definition of the word 'view' in the interpretation provisions of the FLA; the amendment of the section 60B objects provisions to incl...