2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CHAOS-4 geomagnetic field model

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
251
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(256 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
251
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The distinctive pattern of SV is caused by a westward motion of the flux lobes [12,7], situated in the regions between A (80 • E) and B (120 • E), between C (170 • E) and D (220 • E), and a weaker patch between E (280 • E) and F (310 • E): see also the supplementary movies S1 and S2 of the time-evolution of the main field and its SV. As the patches of negative radial flux move, they create negative signatures in the SV at their leading edges (A, C, E) and positive signatures at their trailing edges (B, D, F).…”
Section: Observations Of Intense High-latitude Secular Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The distinctive pattern of SV is caused by a westward motion of the flux lobes [12,7], situated in the regions between A (80 • E) and B (120 • E), between C (170 • E) and D (220 • E), and a weaker patch between E (280 • E) and F (310 • E): see also the supplementary movies S1 and S2 of the time-evolution of the main field and its SV. As the patches of negative radial flux move, they create negative signatures in the SV at their leading edges (A, C, E) and positive signatures at their trailing edges (B, D, F).…”
Section: Observations Of Intense High-latitude Secular Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent high resolution data from the Ørsted, CHAMP and Swarm satellite missions, along with ground-based observatory data, show that, over the past decade, the northern flux lobes over Canada and Siberia have not only been moving but accelerating [7,1]. In this article, we provide an explanation of this new observation based on an accelerating tangent cylinder jet that sheds light on the hidden internal dynamics of the core, and which adds to the body of evidence suggesting a marked difference in magnetic change between low and high latitudes [8,9,6,10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore a new index called RC (Appendix B) was proposed as part of the CHAOS-4 geomagnetic field model (Olsen et al 2014). It was originally derived from observatory hourly means (OHMs) at 21 globally distributed locations at low and mid geomagnetic latitudes (−41 • ≤ θ M ≤ 54 • ), excluding regions close to the geomagnetic equator that are affected by the equatorial electrojet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dst index (or its refined version, the RC index) and its time derivative are used to search magnetically quiet periods and to characterize time variations in the external field with its induction effect (Maus and Lühr 2005;Olsen et al 2005b). Magnetically quiet times are associated with the conditions of |Dst| < 30 nT and |dDst/dt| or |dRC/dt| being less than 2 or 5 nT /h (Olsen et al 2014;Maus et al 2010;Sabaka et al 2015). CHAOS, CM-5 and SIFM characterize weak global activity with the condition Kp ≤ 2 o (Olsen et al 2006;Sabaka et al 2015;Olsen et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…−2nT < B z < 6 nT and |B y | < 8 nT Maus et al (2010)). For MEF (or for its revised version by Newell et al (2007)) a typical condition for weak electrojet activity is M EF < 0.8 mV /m (Olsen et al 2014;Maus et al 2010;Sabaka et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%