2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characteristic length of cooperative rearranging region for uniaxial drawn poly(ethylene terephthalate) films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45,54,55,56 Similar results are obtained after UCW and SEQ drawings even if the cooperativity length is slightly higher ( T = 2.0 nm). These results are supported by previous ones obtained with drawn PET, 49,57,58,59 showing that drawing can also induce high heterogeneities in molecular dynamics. The decrease of the cooperativity length in drawn materials is mainly associated to two phenomena: the complexity of the environment that causes heterogeneities in the relaxation process so creates an effect close to confinement conditions, and the orientation of the macromolecules that causes the breaking of weak energy intermolecular bonds.…”
Section: Thermal Analysis and Molecular Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…45,54,55,56 Similar results are obtained after UCW and SEQ drawings even if the cooperativity length is slightly higher ( T = 2.0 nm). These results are supported by previous ones obtained with drawn PET, 49,57,58,59 showing that drawing can also induce high heterogeneities in molecular dynamics. The decrease of the cooperativity length in drawn materials is mainly associated to two phenomena: the complexity of the environment that causes heterogeneities in the relaxation process so creates an effect close to confinement conditions, and the orientation of the macromolecules that causes the breaking of weak energy intermolecular bonds.…”
Section: Thermal Analysis and Molecular Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…and given in Table . The volume of a CRR ( ξ 3 ) varies in the same range than those calculated for other glass‐formers . It decreases of about 60% as the percentage of TA or ATBC reached 10 %wt.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…To explain this result, we should first consider that despite the orientation of the macromolecules, the material is non-crystalline which means that the amorphous phase is not confined in any way. That makes a big difference compare to semi-crystalline drawn materials that typically exhibit lower cooperativity motions at the glass transition [5,14]. In this latter case, the decrease of cooperativity induced by the drawing should not be attributed to the induced orientation of the macromolecules but to the presence of crystallites confining the amorphous phase.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 98%
“…External hindrances are related to geometrical restrictions like the confinement between nanolayers [7,8] or the addition of additives such as fillers [9,10] or plasticizer [11]. On the other hand, internal hindrances are related to the materials itself, in other words its microstructural modifications such as spherulitic crystallization [12,13] or orientation/crystallization of the amorphous phase induced by drawing [5,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%