2001
DOI: 10.1002/sce.1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The characteristics of formative assessment in science education

Abstract: Formative assessment, in this article, is defined as "the process used by teachers and students to recognize and respond to student learning in order to enhance that learning, during the learning." The findings of a two-year research project in New Zealand indicate that formative assessment has the following characteristics: responsiveness, sources of evidence, a tacit process, using professional knowledge and experiences, an integral part of teaching and learning, formative assessment is done by both teachers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
184
0
13

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
184
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Properly integrating formative assessment in instruction is central to effective science teaching practice (Marshall, Horton, & Smart, 2009;Marzano, 2006). Further, effective instruction incorporates assessment that draws upon student prior knowledge, develops solid conceptual development, involves student reflection, and provides varied and appropriate assessments (Bell & Cowie, 2001;Black & Wiliam, 1998;Bransford et al, 2000;Driver, Squires, Rushworth, & WoodRobinson, 1994;Stiggins, 2005;White & Frederiksen, 1998;Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).…”
Section: Measuring Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properly integrating formative assessment in instruction is central to effective science teaching practice (Marshall, Horton, & Smart, 2009;Marzano, 2006). Further, effective instruction incorporates assessment that draws upon student prior knowledge, develops solid conceptual development, involves student reflection, and provides varied and appropriate assessments (Bell & Cowie, 2001;Black & Wiliam, 1998;Bransford et al, 2000;Driver, Squires, Rushworth, & WoodRobinson, 1994;Stiggins, 2005;White & Frederiksen, 1998;Wiggins & McTighe, 2005).…”
Section: Measuring Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of developing a reliable, valid, and diagnostic assessment tool that can be administered quickly to measure conceptual knowledge (with the possibility of being automated in the future) was greatly appealing to the school-based research team working within a PBL environment where assessment still relied too heavily on conventional assessment formats with all their inherent problems-despite the focus moving from summative to formative assessment (Bell & Cowie, 2001;Yorke, 2003) -for example, multiple choice questions (see Glass & Sinha, 2013). Hence, the aim of this research was to explore the following questions: How can a more timely and diagnostic formative assessment to test student knowledge be developed and tested?…”
Section: The Development and Validation Of A New Assessment Tool-the mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La evaluación continua conlleva una reflexión constante entre docentes y estudiantes para mejorar de forma conjunta la enseñanza y por ende el aprendizaje. Asimismo, supone una retroalimentación constante del proceso, ayudando al estudiante a regular su aprendizaje (Bell y Cowie, 2001;Black y William, 2009;Sephard, 2005).…”
Section: E) Continuaunclassified