2006
DOI: 10.21236/ada451393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Charge Designer's Workbench: A Range of Interior Ballistic Modeling Tools

Abstract: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many interior ballistic models historically [3,11] . Three levels of interior ballistic models employed are the IBHVG2 lumped-parameter interior ballistic code; the XKTC one dimensional (1-D), two-phase flow interior ballistic code; and NGEN3 multidimensional, two-phase flow interior ballistic code.…”
Section: Interior Ballistic Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many interior ballistic models historically [3,11] . Three levels of interior ballistic models employed are the IBHVG2 lumped-parameter interior ballistic code; the XKTC one dimensional (1-D), two-phase flow interior ballistic code; and NGEN3 multidimensional, two-phase flow interior ballistic code.…”
Section: Interior Ballistic Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case where 2e 1 > 2e 2 , the propellant grains will fracture but not burnout, and then are likely to be ejected from barrel after shot exit [14]. For this reason, in this paper, only two cases 2e 1 = 2e 2 and 2e 1 < 2e 2 are considered.…”
Section: Analysis Of Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study has demonstrated the value of the hierarchy of interior ballistic codes: An excellent agreement has been shown in prediction of maximum pressures using all three codes (IBHVG2, XKTC and NGEN3); A good agreement has been shown in the nature of pressure-wave simulations provided by XKTC and NGEN3; NGEN3 provided detailed insight into the controlling processes and interactions. Horst et al [5] have simulated a generic gun/propelling charge configuration using a range of interior ballistic models. XKTC and NGEN predicted temporary pressure-waves with the base pressure bigger than the breech pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%