2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-017-1263-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cheeger constant of a Jordan domain without necks

Abstract: We show that the maximal Cheeger set of a Jordan domain Ω without necks is the union of all balls of radius r=h(Ω)^−1 contained in Ω. Here, h(Ω) denotes the Cheeger constant of Ω, that is, the infimum of the ratio of perimeter over area among subsets of Ω, and a Cheeger set is a set attaining the infimum. The radius r is shown to be the unique number such that the area of the inner parallel set Ωr is equal to π r^2. The proof of the main theorem requires the combination of several intermediate facts, some of w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this property is also satisfied for all r>(1R)/2 since Ω contains no ball of such radius r. Applying now [, Theorem 1.4], we conclude that the Cheeger set of Ω is given by Or0, that is, h1false(Ωfalse)=Ffalse(r0false). Moreover, Or0 is a unique minimizer of h1false(Ωfalse).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, this property is also satisfied for all r>(1R)/2 since Ω contains no ball of such radius r. Applying now [, Theorem 1.4], we conclude that the Cheeger set of Ω is given by Or0, that is, h1false(Ωfalse)=Ffalse(r0false). Moreover, Or0 is a unique minimizer of h1false(Ωfalse).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Proof Evidently, each Or with r[0,(1R)/2] is an admissible set for the minimization problem h1false(Ωfalse), that is, h1false(Ωfalse)Ffalse(r0false):=trueprefixminr0,false(1Rfalse)/2Ffalse(rfalse).To show that h1false(Ωfalse)=Ffalse(r0false), let us recall the following definition from . It is said that Ω has no necks of radius r if for any two balls Brfalse(x0false),Brfalse(x1false)normalΩ there exists a continuous curve γ:false[0,1false]normalΩ such that γfalse(0false)=x0,γfalse(1false)=x1,andBrfalse(γ(t)false)normalΩforalltfalse[0,1false].It is not hard to observe that Ω satisfies this property for all ...…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following result is crucial to our purposes. It can be regarded as a transposition, valid within the class A, of a well-known result for the inner Cheeger set of convex bodies due to Kawohl and Lachand-Robert (see Theorem 1 in [13]); we also refer to [16] for a recent extension to domains 'without necks'.…”
Section: Definition 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, precise estimates for the Cheeger constant and explicit characterisation of the Cheeger set for general strips were given in [9] and further improved in [11]. See also the recent papers [12] (which contains a characterisation of the maximal Cheeger set within a Jordan domain of the Euclidean plane) and [13] (where, motivated by capillarity-related issues, two nontrivial examples of minimal Cheeger sets in the plane are constructed). It is frustrating that already a three-dimensional cube does not admit an explicitly known Cheeger constant and there is no explicit analytical description of its Cheeger set (see [5,Open Problem 1]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%