1997
DOI: 10.1086/303726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Chemical Evolution of the Galaxy: The Two‐Infall Model

Abstract: In this paper we present a new chemical evolution model for the Galaxy which assumes two main infall episodes for the formation of halo-thick disk and thin disk, respectively. We do not try to take into account explicitly the evolution of the halo since our model is better suited for computing the evolution of the disk (thick plus thin) but we implicitly assume that the timescale for the formation of the halo was of the same order as the timescale for the formation of the thick disk.The formation of the thin-d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

87
1,189
10
21

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 908 publications
(1,307 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
87
1,189
10
21
Order By: Relevance
“…We have assumed the Galaxy disc to assemble by means of a single gas accretion episode, with typical time scale τ = 7 Gyr. In any case, our method can be easily extended also for a two-infall model (Chiappini et al 1997).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have assumed the Galaxy disc to assemble by means of a single gas accretion episode, with typical time scale τ = 7 Gyr. In any case, our method can be easily extended also for a two-infall model (Chiappini et al 1997).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They note that theoretical chemical evolution models (Carigi 1994) in which carbon comes from intermediate stars apparently predict too shallow a C/O relation to fit their observed galaxy abundance gradients. Other recent discussions of C/O gradients across our own or other galaxies, or of C/O ratios in low metallicity galaxies, have been given by Götz and Köppen (1992), Prantzos, Vangioni-Flam & Chauveau (1994), Kunth et al (1995), Garnett et al (1995), Carigi et al (1995), Mollá, Ferrini, and Díaz (1997) and Chiappini, Matteucci & Gratton (1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Classical chemical evolutionary models predict different temporal behaviors depending on assumptions over the gas inflow and outflow rates, the star and cloud formation efficiencies, and other set-up physical conditions. Models might predict a steepening of metallicity gradients with time (e.g., Chiappini et al 1997Chiappini et al , 2001), or, conversely, a flattening of such gradients (e.g., Mollá et al 1997Mollá et al , 2005Magrini et al 2007b). The main differences between the two groups of models are the efficiency of the enrichment processes in the inner and outer regions of the disk, and the nature of the material (primordial or pre-enriched) falling from the halo onto the disk.…”
Section: The Time-evolution Of the Radial Metallicity Gradientmentioning
confidence: 99%