1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(96)02851-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Children's Affective Lability Scale: A psychometric evaluation of reliability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emotional Dysregulation-As seen in Figure 4, total Children's Affective Lability Scale scores decreased significantly (paired t = 3.0, p = .02, d = 0.3) from mean pretreatment values comparable to those reported among inpatient samples, to posttreatment values below those reported for outpatient samples (see Gerson et al, 1996).…”
Section: Treatment Responsementioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Emotional Dysregulation-As seen in Figure 4, total Children's Affective Lability Scale scores decreased significantly (paired t = 3.0, p = .02, d = 0.3) from mean pretreatment values comparable to those reported among inpatient samples, to posttreatment values below those reported for outpatient samples (see Gerson et al, 1996).…”
Section: Treatment Responsementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Similarly, at intake, four participants endorsed a history of nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior. Decreases in nonsuicidal self-injury on the K-SADS-DRS (item 30) were not statistically significant (paired t = 2.1, p = .06, d = 0.8), but it is noteworthy that no nonsuicidal self-injurious acts were reported during the final study assessment period.Emotional Dysregulation-As seen in Figure 4, total Children's Affective Lability Scale scores decreased significantly (paired t = 3.0, p = .02, d = 0.3) from mean pretreatment values comparable to those reported among inpatient samples, to posttreatment values below those reported for outpatient samples (see Gerson et al, 1996).Mood Symptoms-Adolescents showed significant improvement in depressive symptomatology. Total K-SADS-DRS summary scores dropped from the moderate range at intake (mean 23.1 ± 12.0) to the mild range at 12-month follow-up (mean 14.9 ± 10.6; paired t = 2.6, p = .03, d = .7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IQ was measured using the Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (Wechsler, 1999). Additionally, parents/guardians of youth participants completed the PGBI-10 M [Parent Version, General Behavior Inventory (Youngstrom et al, 2008), to assess the severity of behavioral and emotional dysregulation in their offspring during the last 6 months; only parents of BO and NBO completed this questionnaire]; the SCARED-P (Self-Report for Childhood Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders, Parent Version, to assess offspring anxiety over last 2 weeks; Birmaher et al, 1997); the CALS-P (The Children's Affective Lability Scale, Parent Version; Gerson et al, 1996); the MFQ-P (Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, Parent Version, to assess the severity of depression during the last 2 weeks; Angold et al, 1995); and a questionnaire to assess sociodemographic status represented by parental education (Hollingshead, 1975). Youth participants completed child report versions of affective symptomatology scales: the CALS-C, SCARED-C, MFQ-C. Pubertal status of youth was assessed using a self-report questionnaire (Petersen et al, 1988).…”
Section: Assessment Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is overlap among these constructs, studies have found that temperament and behavioral problem measures have at least some independence (Eisenberg et al, 1996(Eisenberg et al, , 2001Gerson et al, 1996;Maedgen & Carlson, 2000;Shields & Cicchetti, 2001). In terms of method and informant, some instruments involve observations or outcomes of child performance tasks (e.g., puzzle tasks).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%