2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The choice of surgical approach in the treatment of vesico-vaginal fistulae

Abstract: Vesico-vaginal fistula is a global healthcare problem that has a high prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa, where obstetric complications lead to the development of this condition. Despite this, comparatively few fistula repairs are performed in well-resourced countries, where iatrogenic injury is the leading aetiological factor. As a consequence, much of our knowledge results from the experience of relatively few fistula surgeons in areas of high prevalence borne out of large case series or retrospective cohorts … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The route chosen depends on several factors such as the training, surgical skills and expertise/ experience of the surgeon, patient anatomic factors such as fistula characteristics (size, location, severity) and involvement of other structures. 21,22 In this series, the abdominal and combined abdomino-vaginal routes were applied in the repair of more than half of the patients. This is due to the fact that sixteen (64%) patients, had in addition to fistula closure, other adjunctive procedures such as ureteric re-implantation, abdominal hysterectomy, and construction of continent catheterizable neo-bladder that were done as has been similarly reported by Rutam et al 10 These adjunctive surgical procedures in addition to the fistula closure are better done through the combined abdomino-vaginal route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The route chosen depends on several factors such as the training, surgical skills and expertise/ experience of the surgeon, patient anatomic factors such as fistula characteristics (size, location, severity) and involvement of other structures. 21,22 In this series, the abdominal and combined abdomino-vaginal routes were applied in the repair of more than half of the patients. This is due to the fact that sixteen (64%) patients, had in addition to fistula closure, other adjunctive procedures such as ureteric re-implantation, abdominal hysterectomy, and construction of continent catheterizable neo-bladder that were done as has been similarly reported by Rutam et al 10 These adjunctive surgical procedures in addition to the fistula closure are better done through the combined abdomino-vaginal route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transvaginal approach can be used to manage most of the simple VVFs whereas complex fistulas that include large fistulas (>4 cm), multiple fistulas, those requiring ureteric re-implant (ureteric orifice close to the fistula) or bladder augmentation and post radiotherapy fistulas are best managed by transabdominal route. [8][9][10][11] Although many a times the most important deciding factor is the familiarity and expertise of the surgeon with the said approach and procedure. In our study both transvaginal and transabdominal approaches for VVF repair had an almost equal outcome with success rates of 92.2% and 95.2% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bladder is commonly fibrotic and non-compliant and sometimes requires augmentation [12]. VVFs that develop after RT may manifest months to years after and are associated with endarteritis obliterans and tissue ischaemia [13].…”
Section: Aetiologymentioning
confidence: 99%