Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2330163.2330350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The choice of the offspring population size in the (1,λ) EA

Abstract: We extend the theory of non-elitist evolutionary algorithms (EAs) by considering the offspring population size in the (1,λ) EA. We establish a sharp threshold at λ = log e e−1 n ≈ 5 log 10 n between exponential and polynomial running times on OneMax. For any smaller value, the (1,λ) EA needs exponential time on every function that has only one global optimum. We also consider arbitrary unimodal functions and show that the threshold can shift towards larger offspring population sizes. Finally, we investigate th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the analysis in Oliveto and Witt (2012), the drift is not monotone in X t . Therefore, the standard assumption of the variable drift theorem (see Rowe and Sudholt, 2012 for the most recent version) does not hold. We use the following variant (correcting a minor mistake in a formulation by Feldmann and Kötzing, 2013) instead.…”
Section: Lemma 4 For T ≥ 0 It Holdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the analysis in Oliveto and Witt (2012), the drift is not monotone in X t . Therefore, the standard assumption of the variable drift theorem (see Rowe and Sudholt, 2012 for the most recent version) does not hold. We use the following variant (correcting a minor mistake in a formulation by Feldmann and Kötzing, 2013) instead.…”
Section: Lemma 4 For T ≥ 0 It Holdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is performed by measuring the progress of a function, a so-called distance function, which assigns each state of the search heuristic to a non-negative number reflecting the distance between that state and the optimal solution. A range of drift theorems have been presented in the literature (see for example [8] [9]). Very recently, a general drift theorem that can be considered to be a generalisation of most of the existing drift theorems is introduced in [10].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards we combine the progress made in [4] and [21] on variable drift theorems to new such drift theorem, before we show in a second step that here the restriction to finite state sets is (with a minor restriction) not necessary either.…”
Section: Drift Theorem Adaptationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the mathematical analysis we use the multiplicative and the variable drift theorem (see [5] and [15,18], respectively), as well as well as recent improvements [4,21]. But as these drift theorems require discrete search spaces, we adapt both formally to continuous domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%