2021
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chromosome‐scale assembly of the Canary Islands endemic spiderDysdera silvatica(Arachnida, Araneae) sheds light on the origin and genome structure of chemoreceptor gene families in chelicerates

Abstract: Here, we present the chromosome‐level genome assembly of Dysdera silvatica Schmidt, 1981, a nocturnal ground‐dwelling spider endemic from the Canary Islands. The genus Dysdera has undergone a remarkable diversification in this archipelago mostly associated with shifts in the level of trophic specialization, becoming an excellent model to study the genomic drivers of adaptive radiations. The new assembly (1.37 Gb; scaffold N50 of 174.2 Mb), was performed using the chromosome conformation capture scaffolding tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the advances in spider ecology, evolution, and systematics, knowledge of spider genomes still lags relative to other taxa. Most of the available spider genomes are of poor quality, being highly fragmented ( Garb et al 2018 ) and lack a substantial part of the genome, with only three recent exceptions involving chromosome-resolved genomes ( Escuer et al 2021 ; Fan et al 2021 ; Sheffer et al 2021 ). Several factors contribute to the sparse availability of high-quality spider genome assemblies, including the lack of a model organism among spiders (sensu Drosophila melanogaster in flies and Tribolium castaneum in beetles) ( Brewer et al 2014 ), and the challenges associated with sequencing spider genomes, which are characterized by high AT-content, repeats, heterozygosity, and often large genome sizes ( Garb et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advances in spider ecology, evolution, and systematics, knowledge of spider genomes still lags relative to other taxa. Most of the available spider genomes are of poor quality, being highly fragmented ( Garb et al 2018 ) and lack a substantial part of the genome, with only three recent exceptions involving chromosome-resolved genomes ( Escuer et al 2021 ; Fan et al 2021 ; Sheffer et al 2021 ). Several factors contribute to the sparse availability of high-quality spider genome assemblies, including the lack of a model organism among spiders (sensu Drosophila melanogaster in flies and Tribolium castaneum in beetles) ( Brewer et al 2014 ), and the challenges associated with sequencing spider genomes, which are characterized by high AT-content, repeats, heterozygosity, and often large genome sizes ( Garb et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GALEON identifies gene family clusters by analysing whether paralogous members are physically closer than expected by chance given the genome density of gene family members. In this context, we consider that n physically close members are clustered if they are arranged within a genomic region spanning less than specified cut-off CL value (Vieira et al 2007, Escuer et al 2022:…”
Section: Gene Cluster Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanggaard et al (2014) published the first genome project of spiders and discussed the importance of using genomes to study venom evolution. However, there are only four chromosome‐level spider genome assemblies (Escuer et al, 2021; Fan et al, 2021; Hendrickx et al, 2021; Sheffer et al, 2021), which is far from consistent with the species diversity of spiders. To increase our understanding of evolutionary mechanisms regarding venom, it is necessary to include more high‐quality spider genomes combined with extensive transcriptome and venom proteome sequencing (Garb et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%