2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The chromosphere above sunspots at millimeter wavelengths

Abstract: Aims. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that millimeter wave data can be used to distinguish between various atmospheric models of sunspots, whose temperature structure in the upper photosphere and chromosphere has been the source of some controversy. Methods. We use observations of the temperature contrast (relative to the quiet Sun) above a sunspot umbra at 3.5 mm obtained with the Berkeley-Illinois-Maryland Array (BIMA), complemented by submm observations from Lindsey & Kopp (1995) and 2 cm observatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…alma_csv_obs_v1 than 1000 K for the analyzed active region. However, sunspots are seen in absorption, as localized dark areas, in agreement with some earlier studies for the wavelengths λ ≤ 3.5 mm (Lindsey & Kopp 1995;Loukitcheva et al 2014;Iwai & Shimojo 2015). As present analysis shows, the analyzed sunspot has brightness temperature lower by 90 K than a quiet Sun region at the same radial distance from the solar disc center allowing us to conclude that sunspots are darker not only in comparison with ambient active regions, but also to the quiet Sun regions.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…alma_csv_obs_v1 than 1000 K for the analyzed active region. However, sunspots are seen in absorption, as localized dark areas, in agreement with some earlier studies for the wavelengths λ ≤ 3.5 mm (Lindsey & Kopp 1995;Loukitcheva et al 2014;Iwai & Shimojo 2015). As present analysis shows, the analyzed sunspot has brightness temperature lower by 90 K than a quiet Sun region at the same radial distance from the solar disc center allowing us to conclude that sunspots are darker not only in comparison with ambient active regions, but also to the quiet Sun regions.…”
Section: Summary Discussion and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As expected, active regions at mm and sub-mm wavelengths generally appear as bright areas, although sunspot umbrae, if resolved, have lower brightness temperatures than the quiet Sun level at λ ≤ 3.5 mm (Lindsey & Kopp 1995;Loukitcheva et al 2014;Iwai & Shimojo 2015) or have almost equal brightness temperature as the quiet Sun at λ = 8.8 mm (Iwai et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The first is that it is an intrinsic property of sunspots. The observed umbral brightness temperature was around 900 K higher than cool quiet-Sun regions in the ALMA image, which is in fact consistent with the umbral brightening relative to the quiet Sun suggested by a number of existing models of the umbral atmosphere (e.g., see Loukitcheva et al 2014). This suggests that the discovery in this observation might not be of an "umbral brightness enhancement" but rather of a "penumbral darkening".…”
Section: Origin Of the Umbral Brightness Enhancementsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Hence, the observational results require non-LTE radiative-transfer simulations to facilitate their interpretation. In fact, available atmospheric models for sunspot umbrae show a large scatter of the predicted temperature at the chromosphere (see Figure 6 of Loukitcheva et al 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Kundu & McCullough (1971) detected polarized emission in an AR at λ = 9 mm with P in the range from about 1 to 4%. We have investigated the expected circular polarization from active regions at millimeter wavelengths using two sets of umbral models: the umbral model by Severino et al (1994), which provides the best agreement with the observed mm brightness in umbrae according to Loukitcheva et al (2014), and a more recent semiempirical um- bral model by Fontenla et al (2011). The magnetic field was modeled by a vertical dipole buried under the photosphere, following Zlotnik (1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%