The Circle of Hydro-Hegemony between riparian states, development policies and borderlands: Evidence from the Talas waterscape (Kyrgyzstan-Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Since the 1990s, transboundary water management has come to play a key role both in global environmental politics debates and in the shaping of international development policies, specifically in the Global South. As a consequence, a growing body of literature in the framework of critical hydropolitics has emerged reflecting on the role that power, discourses, and strategies play in shaping transboundary water policies and in influencing riparian relations. The focus on a statecentric perspective, however, often has led to neglect of the role of international development actors in shaping these policies. Through a critical application of the Circle of Hydro-Hegemony (CHH) and ethnographic qualitative field research in borderlands, this contribution aims to analyse how the establishment of a development initiative known as the Chu-Talas Commission, supported by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and other donors, has influenced and shaped transboundary water politics in the Talas waterscape, which is shared by Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. The evidence shows that despite the international narration of the Chu-Talas Commission as a success story for water cooperation in Central Asia, Kazakhstan, through the deployment of both material and bargaining power strategies, has been able to shape UNECE development policies in its favour, impose its agenda on Kyrgyzstan, and emerge as the basin hydro-hegemon.

Effect of Water-Saving Society Policy on Water Consumption in the Cities of China: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

“…The problem faced by this approach is that it not only costs a lot of money and involves a long construction period, but may also lead to serious social and ecological consequences [56]. Cross-regional allocation of water resources must be adapted with an operational arrangement for water cooperation [70,71] and overcoming barriers related to institutional environment and path dependencies [72], social-environmental justice [73] and political challenges [67,68,74]. Another option is to reduce the reverse flow of water from water-scarce areas to water-rich areas caused by virtual water transfer, mainly occurring through internal trade [75].…”

Analysing transboundary water governance: A global‐regional‐national water governance framework of Tonle Sap Lake

“…Power asymmetry triggers hydro-hegemony which, in turn, complicates transboundary water governance (Zeitoun & Warner, 2006;Zinzani & Menga, 2017). Hydro-hegemony drives water interactions in international river basins through arrangements understood as cooperation.…”

Production of scale in regional hydropolitics: An analysis of La Plata River Basin and the Guarani Aquifer System in South America

“…Stemming from globalization and its relation to debates on environmental change, geographers argue that the concept of scale is of the utmost importance for human and environmental matters (Sayre, 2005;. In water governance and hydropolitics, a growing number of scholars have addressed the issue of how the production of scales intersects with problems of the effectiveness of governance of international waters (Wolf, 1998;Uitto and Wolf, 2002;Sneddon and Fox, 2006;Reed and Bruyneel, 2010;Norman et al, 2015;Zinzani and Menga, 2017).…”