2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.63713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cis-regulatory effects of modern human-specific variants

Abstract: The Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes enabled the discovery of sequences that differ between modern and archaic humans, the majority of which are noncoding. However, our understanding of the regulatory consequences of these differences remains limited, in part due to the decay of regulatory marks in ancient samples. Here, we used a massively parallel reporter assay in embryonic stem cells, neural progenitor cells, and bone osteoblasts to investigate the regulatory effects of the 14,042 single-nucleotide modern… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
37
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They have been used to screen potential regulatory elements in diverse cellular contexts, as well as for saturation mutagenesis or tiling along individual regulatory regions of interest (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Beyond regulatory function, MPRAs have also been increasingly applied to assay the differential effects of allelic sequence pairs representing natural human variation, focused on variants that are human-specific or are lead variants of signals in GWAS or expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) (14)(15)(16). However, despite increases in throughput no prior work has systematically dissected linked haplotype blocks in humans to assess the distribution of causal alleles; previous studies either targeted only variants with the strongest associative p-values with respect to particular phenotypes and/or applied extensive prior filtering to reduce library size for sensitive cell types (14,15,17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used to screen potential regulatory elements in diverse cellular contexts, as well as for saturation mutagenesis or tiling along individual regulatory regions of interest (9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Beyond regulatory function, MPRAs have also been increasingly applied to assay the differential effects of allelic sequence pairs representing natural human variation, focused on variants that are human-specific or are lead variants of signals in GWAS or expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) (14)(15)(16). However, despite increases in throughput no prior work has systematically dissected linked haplotype blocks in humans to assess the distribution of causal alleles; previous studies either targeted only variants with the strongest associative p-values with respect to particular phenotypes and/or applied extensive prior filtering to reduce library size for sensitive cell types (14,15,17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work here is the first MPRA study to specifically investigate archaically introgressed alleles and we hope that the contribution of this data set to this growing list of emVars in human populations aids in future evolutionary studies. Notably, we find that a smaller percentage of the variants within active elements are emVars in our introgressed set (11.5%) compared with 30% of variants in active elements from human-accelerated regions (HARs) and human gain enhancers (HGEs) ( Uebbing et al 2021 ), and 30% and 25% of human fixed differences tested in osteoblasts and neural progenitor cells, respectively ( Weiss et al 2021 ). However, in this latter study the authors did identify only 9% emVars in embryonic stem cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We detected 8.2% of emVars had an absolute expression modulation LFC greater than 2. In comparison, Weiss et al (2021) detected 0–1.8% of fixed difference alleles had this strong of effect, whereas Tewhey et al (2016) found 5.5% of tested eQTLs and Uebbing et al found 16.8% of alleles in HARs and HGEs had this at least this strong of an effect. Whether this is due to the nature of positively selected introgressed alleles perhaps being selected for relatively strong effects relative to other types of variants, should be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations