The Clash of Powers in Poland’s Rule of Law Crisis: Tools of Attack and Self-Defense

Abstract

Many people must be wondering how it is possible that Poland, not so long ago hailed for its exemplary transition from a communist dictatorship to a liberal democracy, could have so swiftly descended into authoritarianism via a crisis in the rule of law. The majority of commentators point to the size and ferocity of the attack on those mechanisms meant to safeguard the rule of law, whereas few focus on the weakness of their defence. This article attempts to redress that imbalance. The crucial facts of the Polish crisis are first presented, and the nature of both the attacks on the rule of law in Poland and the measures taken in its defence are then presented. In describing their defence, this article not only draws on Nicholas Barber's concept of the self-defence of institutions, but attempts to improve upon it in the light of the Polish crisis. Further in the article, I argue that one of the reasons for the success of the assault on the rule of law is the formalistic legal mindset that is prevalent among Polish lawyers. This mindset is characterized by a reductionism of the interpretative premises to be applied when deciding constitutional cases. This reductionism is conspicuous in the application of bright-line rules with no consideration of general constitutional principles. I argue that the development of a robust, non-formalistic methodology of legal decision-making is a prerequisite for a successful defence of the rule of law.

‘Pinkwashing’ the radical‐right: Gender and the mainstreaming of radical‐right policies and actions

“…In the past several election cycles in Israel, limiting the powers of the Court and removing checks on the executive has been one of the most salient radical‐right policy agendas that has characterized its tendency toward authoritarian executive aggrandizement 6 . Limiting or otherwise controlling the courts by various means has been a radical‐right strategy in other countries as well and is one feature, among others, of the authoritarian tendencies of some radical‐right actors (Bugarič 2019; Laurent & Scheppele 2017; Matczak 2020).…”

EP-Poland: Building A Bilingual Parallel Corpus For Interpreting Research

“…PiS has raised concerns primarily due to its highly controversial reforms of the judiciary. While PiS argues that these reforms are aimed at disposing of the ubiquitous post-communist remnants, its opponents lament the loss of judicial independence and the gradual politicization of judiciary institutions such as the Constitutional Tribunal (for details on the rule of law crisis, see, e.g., Matczak, 2020). In the European Parliament, the rule of law crisis is manifest in very strong polarization of participats in the relevant debates.…”

Wpływ regulacji międzynarodowych na ograniczenia w kształtowaniu się ustrojów totalitarnych, autorytarnych i dyktatur

“…Niektórzy autorzy wprost odwołują się do tak zwanego autokratycznego legalizmu, kiedy to pod fasadą reformy prawa w rzeczywistości przeprowadza się atak na instytucje i system prawny danego państwa 45 . Wszystko w tym systemie ma bowiem służyć konsolidacji władzy 46 , a prawo stosowane jest instrumentalnie i tylko wtedy, gdy służy celom autorytarnego/autokratycznego rządu 47 . Zwraca się też uwagę na to, że nawet demokratycznie wybrany parlament może stać się marionetką w rękach partii rządzącej, bo deputowani bezrefleksyjnie głosują zgodnie z linią rządu 48 , a co za tym idzie nie są w stanie prawidłowo kontrolować władzy wykonawczej.…”