Redrawing the Class Map 2006
DOI: 10.1057/9780230504592_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Class Structure of Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
106
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that self‐reported social class may be an inexact proxy of a respondent's economic circumstances, we now examine whether our results are robust to alternative measures. Our alternative measures are typically considered sub‐dimensions of social class and include an indicator of a respondent's educational attainment, a measure of a respondent's financial troubles and a measure of occupational status, which we code following Oesch ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given that self‐reported social class may be an inexact proxy of a respondent's economic circumstances, we now examine whether our results are robust to alternative measures. Our alternative measures are typically considered sub‐dimensions of social class and include an indicator of a respondent's educational attainment, a measure of a respondent's financial troubles and a measure of occupational status, which we code following Oesch ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, we expect left‐leaning respondents without such troubles to be supportive of EU transfers. Third, we use occupational categories in the EES following a scheme developed by Oesch () . We analyse these occupational categories with dummy variables.…”
Section: Data and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1992; Inglehart 1990; Kriesi 1993). In their place, new structuring conflicts have developed since the late 1960s, which have been variously labeled as expressions of a ‘new politics’ (Franklin 1992; Müller‐Rommel 1984), a ‘new value’ (Inglehart 1977, 1990) or ‘new class’ (Evans 1999; Kriesi 1998; Manza & Brooks 1999; Lachat 2004; Oesch 2006) cleavage. The so‐called ‘new social movements’ that mobilized in the name of cultural liberalism and social justice reinvigorated the traditional class cleavage and contributed to the transformation of the cultural dimension from one mainly defined in terms of religious concerns to one opposing culturally liberal or libertarian concerns, on the one side, and the defence of traditional (authoritarian) values and institutions (including traditional Christian religion, traditional forms of the family and a strong army), on the other.…”
Section: The Impact Of the New Structural Conflict On The Structure Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The labor‐market controls are dummy variables for being retired, unemployed (those who are unemployed and actively looking for work), and not being active in the labor force (including those who are undergoing education, unemployed respondents who are not looking for a job, permanently sick or disabled, those in military or community service, and those doing housework or taking care of family members). Social‐class categories are coded according to the Oesch () five‐class schema, using the detailed ISCO occupation categories available in the ESS. We take small business owners as the reference category and include higher‐ and lower‐grade service class, and skilled and unskilled worker categories in the models.…”
Section: Authoritarianism: a Conceptual And Methodological Labyrinthmentioning
confidence: 99%