Rhinoplasty continues be one of the most popular cosmetic procedures performed in the United States, with over 200,000 procedures performed in 2019 alone. As surgeons have realized the importance of maintaining structural integrity of the tip and dorsum, the landscape of rhinoplasty dogma has shifted from reductive techniques alone to include frequent use of grafts and implants and even toward maintaining all structure with preservation rhinoplasty techniques. Grafts and implants allow for resistance of both static forces from gravity and aging, and dynamic forces from tissue contraction/scarring, paranasal muscles, and the pressure changes from normal breathing.With this increased use of grafts comes an increased demand on cartilage. Septum is the standard of graft material; however, with quoted rates of revision rhinoplasty at 10 to 15 percent, septal cartilage is frequently unavailable if previously harvested. 1 The question then arises as to the source of sufficient cartilage to fulfill the structural needs of the rhinoplasty. Other sources of autograft are available, such as conchal or rib cartilage, but their use must be balanced against their donor-site morbidity. Allografts have thus gained popularity. Ten years ago, the only option for cartilage allograft was irradiated rib cartilage. However, modern processing techniques have made fresh cadaveric rib cartilage a viable and relatively cost-effective option.This review discusses the current and most common options available for graft source and implant material and the techniques in graft/ implant choice and placement in both primary and revision rhinoplasties. With this noncomprehensive overview, the authors hope to elucidate techniques that can allow the surgeon to deliver stable, reproducible nasal architecture with a foundational construct that yields optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes.