2023
DOI: 10.3233/asy-231840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clausius–Mossotti formula

Abstract: In this note, we provide a short and robust proof of the Clausius–Mossotti formula for the effective conductivity in the dilute regime, together with an optimal error estimate. The proof makes no assumption on the underlying point process besides stationarity and ergodicity, and it can be applied to dilute systems in many other contexts.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As outlined in Section 2.2, our proof is variational and amounts to proving lower and upper bounds on x B that match with Id C x B 1 to the required accuracy. (For the case of the Clausius-Mossotti conductivity formula, we refer to [14], where we provide a PDE version of the present variational argument.) This new approach is very robust: it yields the first optimal error estimate and allows to cover the most general setting regarding particle separation assumptions.…”
Section: Assumptions (H Mommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As outlined in Section 2.2, our proof is variational and amounts to proving lower and upper bounds on x B that match with Id C x B 1 to the required accuracy. (For the case of the Clausius-Mossotti conductivity formula, we refer to [14], where we provide a PDE version of the present variational argument.) This new approach is very robust: it yields the first optimal error estimate and allows to cover the most general setting regarding particle separation assumptions.…”
Section: Assumptions (H Mommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2.8. In [14], we refer to Lemma 2.7 above 3 in the following slightly different form: given a general stationary ergodic point process z (which can possibly be empty), we have for all stationary random fields with EOEj j < 1,…”
Section: Preliminary Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation