2020
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abd34f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Climate, Land, Energy, and Water systems (CLEWs) framework: a retrospective of activities and advances to 2019

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the strengths of the CLEWS approach is that it is not inherently system-biased, indicating that no system is given priority over the other (Ramos et al, 2021). Over the years, the drive of the CLEWS approach by institutions through multiple applications has contributed to closing the gap between science and policy (Ramos et al, 2021). Amidst the benefits being derived from the CLEWS approach, it possesses some limitations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the strengths of the CLEWS approach is that it is not inherently system-biased, indicating that no system is given priority over the other (Ramos et al, 2021). Over the years, the drive of the CLEWS approach by institutions through multiple applications has contributed to closing the gap between science and policy (Ramos et al, 2021). Amidst the benefits being derived from the CLEWS approach, it possesses some limitations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At smaller scales (local level studies), the interactions between the components of the nexus appear to be limited and rather promotes intra-linkages between them. Moreover, mechanisms are not available to promote the transfer of methods and approaches across the regional, national, and/or local scales (Ramos et al, 2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generic modules in the CLEW framework have been linked in various combinations and applied to several case studies for integrated assessment of the SDGs. Ramos et al (2020) presents the history of the CLEWs framework and a detailed review of various models and application to 2019 Ramos et al (2020). Concurrently, more research efforts have been directed at water-energy, energy-land or water-land bilateral interactions, and increasingly to linkages among water, energy and land (WEL) resources Khan et al (2017); Liu et al (2018b); Albrecht et al (2018).…”
Section: Climate Land (And Food) Energy and Water Nexus Modeling Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the country, basin, or even larger scales, and when considering long-term perspectives, responses between CLEW sectors are always present and should therefore be considered. The major barrier to using models that include all CLEW linkages are the complexity of methodology, and the difficulty of gathering data and expertize from different sectors, which limits numbers of groups that have the resources to build and maintain broad cross-sector capacity, both at the academic and institutional level Kaddoura and El Khatib (2017); Ramos et al (2020). This review identifies research gaps and provides a perspective on some of the required developments for full CLEW models from a scientific point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation