2018
DOI: 10.1097/yct.0000000000000435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical Alliance and Research in Electroconvulsive Therapy Network

Abstract: There was substantial heterogeneity in the use of ECT between participating centers, indicating that the Network is representative of modern ECT practice. The Clinical Alliance and Research in ECT Network may therefore offer the opportunity to improve service delivery and facilitate the investigation of unresolved research questions pertaining to modern ECT practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we used the model that included "Patient" as a random effect as a null model (Null model 0), and we used it as a reference when selecting which factors were regarded as variables of interest and were introduced as fixed terms. The following approach was computed for every dependent variable (SQI [31], SAMS [22], and PSIr [49,50]) to detect which independent factors (sociodemographic, clinical, and procedural variables) predicted each outcome; separately for each factor, we calculated a mixed model that included the factors as fixed terms adjusted by individual as a random effect (univariate analysis). Furthermore, a multivariate model including all the variables that were statistically significant in the univariate models (p-value < 0.05) was implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we used the model that included "Patient" as a random effect as a null model (Null model 0), and we used it as a reference when selecting which factors were regarded as variables of interest and were introduced as fixed terms. The following approach was computed for every dependent variable (SQI [31], SAMS [22], and PSIr [49,50]) to detect which independent factors (sociodemographic, clinical, and procedural variables) predicted each outcome; separately for each factor, we calculated a mixed model that included the factors as fixed terms adjusted by individual as a random effect (univariate analysis). Furthermore, a multivariate model including all the variables that were statistically significant in the univariate models (p-value < 0.05) was implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these indexes might be altered by artefacts during the recording, the motor and EEG seizure duration plus the postictal suppression rating (PSIr) were visually determined by a psychiatrist with expertise in ECT. The PSIr was analyzed by a single rater using a Likert scale (0-3), with examples and descriptors of the levels of quality [49] based on the Nobler et al [50] approach.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Seizure Adequacy Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the era of personalized medicine and international consortia, such as The Global ECT-MRI Research Collaboration (GEMRIC) [55], the Genetics of Electroconvulsive Therapy International Consortium (Gen-ECT-ic) [56], and the Clinical Alliance and Research in ECT Network (CARE) [57], we have an exceptional opportunity to further evaluate the neurobiological underpinnings of ECT-related cognitive side effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seizure characteristics were determined by 2-channel electroencephalogram (EEG), duration and postictal suppression index (PSI) were provided by the Thymatron device, and the motor and EEG seizure duration plus the postictal suppression rating (PSIr) using a 0–3 scale 16 , 17 were determined visually by a psychiatrist with expertise in ECT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%