2020
DOI: 10.2196/15375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation for People With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Background Telerehabilitation can facilitate multidisciplinary management for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). It provides health care access to individuals who are physically and economically disadvantaged. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation compared with a clinic-based intervention for people with NCLBP in Nigeria. Methods … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
82
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, internet delivery of health care (eg, for low back pain and chronic pain) has demonstrated heterogeneous effects on health care use and clinical outcomes [ 24 , 25 ]. Telerehabilitation may improve outcomes of internet-based care delivery [ 26 ] and reduce attrition [ 27 ] and may be able to replace face-to-face care that includes exercise [ 21 ] while reducing costs [ 28 ]. Further, group-based telerehabilitation may be more cost-effective and includes an opportunity for peer-to-peer support, and its outcomes are comparable with those for individual care for musculoskeletal conditions [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, internet delivery of health care (eg, for low back pain and chronic pain) has demonstrated heterogeneous effects on health care use and clinical outcomes [ 24 , 25 ]. Telerehabilitation may improve outcomes of internet-based care delivery [ 26 ] and reduce attrition [ 27 ] and may be able to replace face-to-face care that includes exercise [ 21 ] while reducing costs [ 28 ]. Further, group-based telerehabilitation may be more cost-effective and includes an opportunity for peer-to-peer support, and its outcomes are comparable with those for individual care for musculoskeletal conditions [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is a lack of scientific evidence on biobehavioural physiotherapy treatment in PPS, even more so on the approach of this type of patient with physiotherapy through telerehabilitation. There is a growing use of telematic intervention and online assessment, an excellent low-cost tool 34) , that is limited by the lack of interpersonal proximity. It is therefore crucial to employ strategies that increase the patient's self-efficacy and adherence to TE, given this is a primary pillar of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, with the guidance and supervision of cell phones or other wearable devices, patients can complete the corresponding rehabilitation training, reducing their financial burden and improving their compliance. Studies have shown that the economic burden of internetbased tele-rehabilitation was not significantly different from that of traditional rehabilitation, and will decrease with the development of the IOT and the popularity of devices (9,12,13). For patients living in remote areas, telerehabilitation is more economical and practical.…”
Section: Home Rehabilitation Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%