2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical and histopathological features of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies with asymmetric muscle involvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IMNM has been characterized by subacute onset of symmetrical proximal muscle weakness, elevated CPK levels, and myopathic findings of electromyography [3,6]. In a recent clinical study [7], 134 patients with inflammatory myopathy were reviewed, and only 13 patients (9.2%) with asymmetric muscle involvement were identified, which indicated that the condition is rare. The condition primarily presented with dermatomyositis and presented as IMNM in four patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IMNM has been characterized by subacute onset of symmetrical proximal muscle weakness, elevated CPK levels, and myopathic findings of electromyography [3,6]. In a recent clinical study [7], 134 patients with inflammatory myopathy were reviewed, and only 13 patients (9.2%) with asymmetric muscle involvement were identified, which indicated that the condition is rare. The condition primarily presented with dermatomyositis and presented as IMNM in four patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to clinical assessments, “chronic disease duration” was defined as a duration over 12 months from the disease onset to first examination 19 . Muscle strength was evaluated by the ordinal six‐point (0–5) manual muscle testing (MMT) scale; asymmetric muscle weakness was defined as no less than 1 grade measured by MMT between two sides of the same muscle group or the same joint activity 20 . Treatment outcomes were graded as follows: no improvement, mild improvement (1 grade improvement in at least one muscle group, persistently requiring assistance in daily activities), moderate improvement (>1 grade in multiple muscle groups, occasionally requiring assistance in daily activities), marked improvement (only mild weakness without functional impairment), or return to baseline (no symptoms or signs of muscle weakness); a favorable outcome was defined as marked improvement or return to baseline 21 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%