Objective:To determine whether surgery for adnexal masses in the first trimester of pregnancy affects subsequent pregnancy outcomes compared to surgery in the second trimester.Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed from women who underwent adnexal mass surgery before 26 weeks of gestation at a university hospital between July 2008 and June 2018. Women who underwent surgery in the first trimester were classified as group 1 (n=78) and those in the second trimester were classified as group 2 (n=48).Information on clinical characteristics and pregnancy outcomes was obtained from medical records and follow-up interviews and compared between two groups.Results: There were no differences in age, parity, mass size, laparoscopy, and operation time between the two groups. A total of 98 cases were confirmed as ovarian torsion, including 72 cases in group 1 and 26 cases in group 2. Accordingly, adnexectomy was performed more often in group 1 (P=0.002). No significant differences concerning the rate of abortion, preterm birth, or cesarean delivery were found.Conclusion: Surgery for adnexal masses performed in the first trimester is almost as safe as that in the second trimester. Surgery should be performed for women with a complex adnexal mass in the first trimester to avoid unfavorable complications.
K E Y W O R D SAdnexal masses; Adnexal torsion; First trimester; Pregnancy outcomes; Second trimester; Surgery During the study period, a total of 160 women underwent surgery for adnexal masses before 26 weeks of gestation (Fig. 1). Among them, six women did not want to continue the pregnancy and received aspiration and curettage. For two women, the pregnancy was terminated by intraamniotic injection of ethacridine lactate because of fetal malformation (one for Down syndrome and the other for serious hydronephrosis of the fetus). The remaining 152 women continued the pregnancy, including 26 women lost to follow-up. Finally, 126 (82.9%) women met the inclusion criteria. In total, 78 cases were included in group 1 and 48 cases were included in group 2. The median age of gestation at the time of surgery was 9 weeks in group 1 and 15 5/7 weeks in group 2.Data showing the patients' characteristics are shown in Table 1.There was no difference in terms of maternal age, parity, or adnexal mass size between the two groups. Significantly more emergency surgeries were performed in group 1 compared with group 2 (75 [96.2%] vs 29 [60.4%], P<0.001). There were more twin pregnancies and more patients conceived through assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in group 1 (P=0.008 and P=0.007, respectively).The characteristics of the surgical procedure are shown in Table 2.There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding use of laparoscopy or operation time. However, surgical indications were significantly different. Suspected ovarian torsion occurred significantly more frequently in cases in group 1 (75 [96.2%], P<0.001), while a persistent mass was more frequent in group 2 (19 [39.6%], P<0.001). A total of 98 cases we...