1987
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520130016010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
1
3

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
86
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite established clinical diagnostic criteria for AD, 9 a clinical diagnosis of AD often differs from neuropathologic findings. [10][11][12][13] Many studies have focused on the influence of Lewy body pathology in the clinical phenotype of AD within consistent results. 8,1418 There is controversy as to whether there are differences in parkinsonian features, 8,14,16,19,20 cognitive deficits, 16,17,[19][20][21] cognitive decline, 8,14 and the presence of visual hallucinations 8,17,18,20,22 between AD with Lewy bodies and AD without Lewy bodies (eTable in the Supplement).…”
Section: Main Outcomes and Measures-clinical And Neuropsychiatric Tesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite established clinical diagnostic criteria for AD, 9 a clinical diagnosis of AD often differs from neuropathologic findings. [10][11][12][13] Many studies have focused on the influence of Lewy body pathology in the clinical phenotype of AD within consistent results. 8,1418 There is controversy as to whether there are differences in parkinsonian features, 8,14,16,19,20 cognitive deficits, 16,17,[19][20][21] cognitive decline, 8,14 and the presence of visual hallucinations 8,17,18,20,22 between AD with Lewy bodies and AD without Lewy bodies (eTable in the Supplement).…”
Section: Main Outcomes and Measures-clinical And Neuropsychiatric Tesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] When standardized clinical diagnostic criteria are used, interrater reliability 6 and consistency of diagnosis between the initial visit and 1-year follow-up is high (95% in Forette 11 ). There are 13 studies, 3 Class I 12-14 and 10 Class II, 9,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] that have addressed the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of AD using neuropathologic confirmation as the "gold standard." Both the DSM-IIIR "Dementia of the Alzheimer type" (DAT) and the NINCDS-ADRDA "probable" AD definitions achieved either good sensitivity (average across cited studies = 81%, range 49 to 100%) for AD at the expense of specificity (average across cited studies = 70%, range 47 to 100%) or vice versa in the majority of the cited studies.…”
Section: Are Current Diagnostic Criteria Able To Establish a Diagnosimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one Class I study 12 reported the sensitivity (43%) and specificity (95%) of a published criteria, NINDS-AIREN, for VAD. Four Class II studies with patient samples drawn from referral cohorts [15][16][17]27,28 reported sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of vascular dementia with any criteria. With one exception, their results had the same diagnostic accuracy as the population-based studies, with low sensitivity (average across 5 studies = 50%, range 20 to 89%) but higher specificity (average across 5 studies = 87%, range 64 to 98%) for the HIS, DSM-IIIR, NINDS-AIREN, or California clinical criteria.…”
Section: Vascular Dementia (Vad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insbesondere ist in der Syst-Eur-Studie auch anzuzweifeln, ob eine zuverlässige Differenzialdiagnose zwischen AD und VD gelungen ist. Auf Grund der starken Überschnei-dungen der beiden Entitäten sind sowohl CCT als auch Hachinski-Score hierzu nur sehr bedingt geeignet [39,85]. An der HO-PE-Studie ist u. a. die Art der Präsentati-on der Ergebnisse bemängelt worden, wodurch die klinischen Effekte überschätzt [84].…”
Section: Kritische Beurteilung Der Studienergebnisseunclassified