The clinical efficacy of the allogenic demineralized dentin matrix graft for implant placement: a systematic review

Mahardawi, Basel; Jiaranuchart, Sirimanas; Dhanesuan, Kanit; Arunjaroensuk, Sirida; Mattheos, Nikos; Pimkhaokham, Atiphan

doi:10.1007/s10006-023-01170-6

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results obtained from the eight samples using homologous bone graft support the viability of the homologous bone block application to prepare the ground for future rehabilitation with dental implants. Similar results for allogenic bone showing its efficacy were presented through the other clinical studies, in which the authors reported its feasibility alternative to the autogenous bone, mainly if considering the tissue limitations during the treatment planning [28,29]. Otherwise, the bone substitution during the remodeling process can be regarded as partial and slower than the gold standard [29].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Histological Assessment of Bone Regeneration in the Maxilla with Homologous Bone Graft: A Feasible Option for Maxillary Bone Reconstruction

Motta,

Soares,

Fernandes

et al. 2024

JRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone biomaterials have been increasingly used to reconstruct maxillary atrophic ridges. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate bone reconstruction in the maxilla using a homologous cortico-cancellous FFB (lyophilized) graft and verify its reliability. Eight individuals were included from 2014 to 2018. The first surgery was performed to install homologous bone blocks in the maxilla. The period of the second intervention varied between 5 months and 15 days to 11 months (≈7.93 months). The biopsies were taken from the central region of the matured graft during the surgery for implant placement. All patients presented clinical and radiographic conditions for the installation of dental implants. There was a 100% of survival rate. The histological assessment showed that the homologous block bone graft was an osteoconductive biomaterial, with connective tissue present, and newly formed bone juxtaposed on its surface. There were bone trabeculae with osteocytes and active osteoblasts with connective tissue in the mineralization process; the remodeling process can be found through the reverse lines. A limited focus of necrosis with fibrosis was detected, with small resorption and areas of inflammatory infiltrate, but without clinical significance. The homologous block bone graft can be considered a feasible option to substitute the autogenous bone graft (gold standard), with predictable clinical and favorable histological results. The patients had a shorter surgical period, low morbidity, and an unlimited amount of biomaterial available at an accessible cost.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 76%

Histological Assessment of Bone Regeneration in the Maxilla with Homologous Bone Graft: A Feasible Option for Maxillary Bone Reconstruction

Motta,

Soares,

Fernandes

et al. 2024

JRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effect of mineralized dentin matrix on the prognosis of bone defect and retained root after coronectomy

Wu,

Zhang,

et al. 2024

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiographic changes after alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous raw tooth particles versus xenograft: A prospective controlled clinical trial

Mahardawi,

Damrongsirirat,

Dhanesuan

et al. 2024

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveThe use of extracted teeth has been introduced as an option for bone grafting. However, the current method requires special machines and solutions, posing significant time and cost. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of autogenous raw tooth particles (RTP), a grafting material made from a ground tooth using basic equipment, for alveolar ridge preservation.Materials and MethodsTwenty‐three patients (12 study/11 control), having 14 and 13 sites were included for the study and control groups (commercially available xenograft), respectively. Radiographic measurements were taken at the baseline and the 4‐month follow‐up appointment. Furthermore, a questionnaire survey concerning the general preference of the type of graft to receive (if needed), before and after knowing the price, was distributed at the completion of the procedure for patients to answer.ResultsAlveolar ridge width change was −1.03 ± 0.64 and −0.84 ± 0.35 for the study and the control groups, respectively. Regarding the height, the study group showed a buccal and lingual change of −0.66 ± 0.48 and −0.78 ± 0.81, respectively, while this was −0.78 ± 0.56 and −0.9 ± 0.41 for the xenograft group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Patients preferred the raw tooth particles over other grafting materials (p = .01).ConclusionNo core biopsies were taken to evaluate bone formation, which should be done in future studies. Within its limitations, the current study demonstrated that RTP graft could be an alternative graft for bone augmentation, offering a new cost‐effective option for clinicians when available.

show abstract

The clinical efficacy of the allogenic demineralized dentin matrix graft for implant placement: a systematic review

Cited by 4 publications

References 30 publications

Histological Assessment of Bone Regeneration in the Maxilla with Homologous Bone Graft: A Feasible Option for Maxillary Bone Reconstruction

Histological Assessment of Bone Regeneration in the Maxilla with Homologous Bone Graft: A Feasible Option for Maxillary Bone Reconstruction

Effect of mineralized dentin matrix on the prognosis of bone defect and retained root after coronectomy

Radiographic changes after alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous raw tooth particles versus xenograft: A prospective controlled clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About