2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00877-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical impact of untreated slow ventricular tachycardia in patients carrying implantable cardiac defibrillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the ADVANCE III trial showed that among patients with slow VT detected in the monitor zone, the rate of adverse events was low (5). A recent study suggests that limiting therapies in the slow VT zone to anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) only will be safe in secondary prevention with slow VT (6). Symptoms will be decisive in such a situation, but if the slow VT is welltolerated, it is postulated that the patient could benefit from avoiding shock therapies (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the ADVANCE III trial showed that among patients with slow VT detected in the monitor zone, the rate of adverse events was low (5). A recent study suggests that limiting therapies in the slow VT zone to anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) only will be safe in secondary prevention with slow VT (6). Symptoms will be decisive in such a situation, but if the slow VT is welltolerated, it is postulated that the patient could benefit from avoiding shock therapies (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study suggests that limiting therapies in the slow VT zone to anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) only will be safe in secondary prevention with slow VT (6). Symptoms will be decisive in such a situation, but if the slow VT is welltolerated, it is postulated that the patient could benefit from avoiding shock therapies (6). However, there are no current guidelines for managing sustained slow VT requiring electrical cardioversion for termination in patients with ICDs for secondary prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%