2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical implications of legalizing marijuana: Are physician and non-physician providers prepared?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of engagement about cannabis has been left to provider discretion, concurrent with increased monitoring of opioid prescriptions. Our results align with literature that suggests that clinicians are not comfortable discussing and/or providing cannabis in clinical settings (Brooks, Gundersen, Flynn, Brooks-Russell, & Bull, 2017; Harle et al, 2015; Herzig et al, 2006; Holland et al, 2016). Clinicians in our study did not discuss cannabis with patients and patients described making decisions to use cannabis for pain management without clinician input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The level of engagement about cannabis has been left to provider discretion, concurrent with increased monitoring of opioid prescriptions. Our results align with literature that suggests that clinicians are not comfortable discussing and/or providing cannabis in clinical settings (Brooks, Gundersen, Flynn, Brooks-Russell, & Bull, 2017; Harle et al, 2015; Herzig et al, 2006; Holland et al, 2016). Clinicians in our study did not discuss cannabis with patients and patients described making decisions to use cannabis for pain management without clinician input.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Given the lack of reliable data on the potential risks and benefits, it is perhaps not surprising that providers are reluctant to discuss marijuana use with their patients. 55,56 Furthermore, physicians may not be aware of the regulations set forth in the enacted law 57 in their state. These facts have led to a call for MM to be included in medical curricula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, only 68.5% of respondents felt knowledgeable when asked about the risks associated with cannabis use. The lack of knowledge can be attributed to the absence of high-quality literature on medical cannabis and relating health measures (7). In addition, since some physician organizations (e.g., Canadian Medical Association) have taken a stance against medical cannabis, independent practitioners may be less likely to seek out information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently, each of these studies identified a gap among physicians' current understanding and comfort level in various topics related to medical cannabis (7-10). However, the discussions of each study recognized that sample size, variation by location and physician demographics make it difficult to draw any conclusive evidence based on their respective results (7)(8)(9)(10). The number of participants, location, mean age of respondents, mean number of years in practice and field of practice for each study are reported in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%