The Clinical Learning Dyad Model: An Innovation in Midwifery Education

Abstract

There is a national shortage of women's health and primary care providers in the United States, including certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives. This shortage is directly related to how many students can be trained within the existing system. The current model of midwifery clinical training is based on apprenticeship, with one-on-one interaction between a student and preceptor. Thus, the number of newly trained midwifery providers is limited by the number of available and willing preceptors. The clinical learning dyad model (CLDM), which pairs 2 beginning midwifery students with one preceptor in a busy practice, addresses this problem. In addition, this model brings in a senior midwife student as a near-peer mentor when the students are first oriented into outpatient clinical practice. The model began as a pilot project to improve the quality of training and increase available student spots in clinical education. This article discusses the origins of the model, the specifics of its design, and the results of a midterm and one-year postintervention survey. Students and preceptors involved in this model identified several advantages to the program, including increased student accountability, enhanced socialization into the profession, improved learning, and reduced teaching burden on preceptors. An additional benefit of the CLDM is that students form a learning community and collaborate with preceptors to care for women in busy clinical settings. Challenges of the model will also be discussed. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the CLDM. This article is part of a special series of articles that address midwifery innovations in clinical practice, education, interprofessional collaboration, health policy, and global health.

Is two a crowd? A qualitative analysis of dyad learning in an OBGYN clinical clerkship

“…Third, our findings did not always align with previous literature from other health professions 43‐50 . In these studies, dyad learning was often tested in the beginning of clinical rotations.…”

Clinical placement models for undergraduate health professions students: A scoping review

“…Programme directors and administrators in Nursing and Medicine often battle with student clinical placements [61]. The large number of students enrolled in undergraduate nursing and medicine against the dwindling clinical placement opportunities drives programme directors to be creative in guaranteeing that their students attain professional competencies [7]. This creativity in student clinical placement may justify the increased volume of literature from Nursing and Medicine.…”

“…The purpose of the placement, the placement activity, the location of the placement -including the length of placement, students, supervision and placement facilitators -are identi ed as variables of a clinical placement model [6]. Clinical placement models that increase placement capacity, are cost-effective and ensure a positive learning culture, are critical for competence development [7]. Innovations in undergraduate health professions education programmes must integrate relevant clinical placement models.…”

Learning with and from Peers in Clinical Education

“…Advantages of this type of peer learning exist for the educator, near-peer mentor, and mentee. For the educator, studies have identified either a reduced teaching burden (Cohen et al 2015;Stenberg et al 2020), or an enhanced ability for the educator to teach higher level competencies (Sevenhuysen et al 2015;Tawfik et al 2016). Other advantages include having the mentor complete the orientation for the mentee (Mills et al 2017).…”