2004
DOI: 10.1002/eat.20065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical presentation of Japanese women with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A study of the Eating Disorders Inventory-2

Abstract: Differences between the Japanese and North American groups suggest that certain cultural differences exist in eating disorder profiles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the North American standardization sample, all the Japanese groups with anorexia and bulimia reported significantly greater maturity fears with EDI-2 20 . Lee et al compared their survey with Hong Kong university students and the data of Canadian females and found that the Hong Kong students showed significantly higher Maturity Fear 21 .…”
Section: Maturity Fearmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with the North American standardization sample, all the Japanese groups with anorexia and bulimia reported significantly greater maturity fears with EDI-2 20 . Lee et al compared their survey with Hong Kong university students and the data of Canadian females and found that the Hong Kong students showed significantly higher Maturity Fear 21 .…”
Section: Maturity Fearmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Asian Americans students scored significantly higher than Afro-Americans and Caucasian Americans on 3 of 6 perfectionism items on the EDI 24 . Compared with the North American sample, the Japanese AN-restricting subtype group (AN-R) presented lower levels of drive for thinness and perfectionism 20 . The Hong Kong students showed significantly lower perfectionism than the Canadian female sample 21 .…”
Section: Perfectionismmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…34 Despite the consistency of cross-cultural DT differences, individuals with eating disor- ders typically exhibit significantly greater DT than non-eating-disordered controls within culturally homogeneous groups, such as Hong Kong 33 and Japan. 35 Thus, although sociocultural context may moderate mean DT levels, similar casecontrol DT distinctions are found in both Western and non-Western cultural settings.…”
Section: Psychological Testingmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…With the exception of a study comparing schoolgirls in Singapore with previously published American data 30 and an assessment across strata defined by religious identification, 49 both of which reported negative findings, these studies have all reported significant between-group differences. Of these, significantly lower DT or weight concern was reported for eating disorder patients in presumably less culturally Western populations compared with reference populations (e.g., AN-R Hong Kong patients compared with AN-R Canadian patients, 33 Japanese compared with North Americans, 35 East Berliners compared with West Berliners, 28,29 and Asian-Americans compared with non-Asian-Americans). 37 Finally, one study demonstrated higher levels of DT in Black, compared with White, preadolescents in the United States.…”
Section: Psychological Testingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[14][15][16] A well-established literature in anthropology and sociology of the body and selfhood [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] suggests avenues for cross-cultural variation in capacity and inclination for self-evaluation with respect to bodily attributes as well as in eating disorder symptom phenomena and severity. [26][27][28] For example, a study of bulimic disorders in India related their low prevalence to the local prominence and cultural support for a sociocentric selfdefinition that the investigators suggest may discourage these behaviors. 29 Likewise, ethnographic data on selfhood and body experience in Fiji support that the relative emphasis on social-rather than personal-attributes constituting identity may diminish personal investment in, and accountability for, body shape or weight.…”
Section: Culture-relevant Considerations For Interpretation Of Dimensmentioning
confidence: 99%