2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000601)88:11<2529::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical significance of CD34 expression in response to therapy of patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evi1 has been found to be epigenetically deregulated and associated with poor prognosis in AML [40]. CD34 is a well-established surface marker present on immature hematopoietic cells that despite having variable prognostic capacity in mixed AML backgrounds [41], is of prognostic significance within some subgroups [42,43]. Though not specifically investigated here, this may suggest a potential role for the reduction of GATA1 levels in the differentiation induced by HDAC inhibitors in AML cells [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evi1 has been found to be epigenetically deregulated and associated with poor prognosis in AML [40]. CD34 is a well-established surface marker present on immature hematopoietic cells that despite having variable prognostic capacity in mixed AML backgrounds [41], is of prognostic significance within some subgroups [42,43]. Though not specifically investigated here, this may suggest a potential role for the reduction of GATA1 levels in the differentiation induced by HDAC inhibitors in AML cells [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suarez et al [26] reported that CD34-positive cells were associated with a noticeable increase in multidrug resistance and antiapoptotic phenotype, such as MDR1 (multidrug resistance protein 1) expression, which conferred resistance to chemotherapy in patients with AML. CD34 was linked with relapse and failure of treatment [13,16,27], whereas 1 study found no association with treatment efficacy [28]. Moreover, Plesa et al [15] demonstrated prognostic significance in the combination of CD33 and CD34 where an adverse outcome was associated with dual positivity or negativity of both markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic value of immunophenotyping in AML has long been controversial (reviewed in Mason et al 8 ). In some studies, antigen expression was investigated as isolated reactivity, [21][22][23]28,30,[36][37][38] whereas in other reports, composite scoring systems were used. 26,[39][40][41] Technical inconsistencies should also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%