2002
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical use of bone resorption markers in patients with malignant bone disease

Abstract: BACKGROUND Advanced tumors often metastasize to bone, resulting in a variety of skeletal complications. Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast‐mediated bone resorption that reduce the incidence and delay the onset of skeletal complications and reduce the need for radiation and surgery. Biochemical markers of bone resorption have been identified that can augment the imaging techniques used to diagnose bone metastases and assess response to bisphosphonate therapy. METHODS In the current study, the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(140 reference statements)
1
36
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates that this group had perhaps at first sight a poor prognostic. Similar results were previously shown in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases where elevated uNTx was predictive of disease extent [24], progression-free survival, and OS [16]. A number of prognostic analyses have been conducted in patients with CRPC [25][26][27][28], although there is currently no universally recognised prognostic index in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It indicates that this group had perhaps at first sight a poor prognostic. Similar results were previously shown in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases where elevated uNTx was predictive of disease extent [24], progression-free survival, and OS [16]. A number of prognostic analyses have been conducted in patients with CRPC [25][26][27][28], although there is currently no universally recognised prognostic index in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Median OS was 20 months (95% CI [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. In the univariate analysis, the factors associated with a favourable survival included uNTx <20 nmol/ml creatinine, a good PS (grade 0 or 1), serum PSA <70 ng/ml, haemoglobin >12 g/dl, and a normal alkaline phosphatase level (Table 2).…”
Section: Prognostic Factors For Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These growth factor and cytokine-mediated interactions lead to stimulation of osteoclastic bone resorption and both uncoupled and unbalanced bone remodeling (28). The effects of cancer on bone cell function can now be assessed accurately by the measurement of specific biochemical markers; for the assessment of bone resorption, these markers are derived from the breakdown of type I collagen, the main protein of bone (29). It is the result of this tumor-induced osteolysis and subsequent loss of the structural integrity of bone that may lead to bone pain, fractures, and other important skeletal complications, rather than stimulation of osteoblastic new bone formation.…”
Section: Use Of Bone Biochemical Markers To Predict Skeletal Morbiditmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast-mediated osteolysis and reduce bone marker levels (8,9). Zoledronic acid (ZOL) Validity of bone marker measurements for monitoring response to bisphosphonate therapy with zoledronic acid in metastatic breast cancer reduces the risk of skeletal-related events and suppresses levels of bone turnover markers in patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases from solid tumors, including breast cancer (10,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%