Eicosanoids and Reproduction 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-3215-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinical use of prostaglandins for cervical ripening and induction of labour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously it has been shown that PGE 2 (1 mg) is much less efficient than 2 mg for induction of labour, and that PGE 2 (2 mg) produces similar results to those obtained with larger doses 3 . Our previous study showed that PGE 2 (5 mg) in wax‐based pessaries for nulliparae and 2.5 mg for multiparae were associated with occasional rapid labours 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Previously it has been shown that PGE 2 (1 mg) is much less efficient than 2 mg for induction of labour, and that PGE 2 (2 mg) produces similar results to those obtained with larger doses 3 . Our previous study showed that PGE 2 (5 mg) in wax‐based pessaries for nulliparae and 2.5 mg for multiparae were associated with occasional rapid labours 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…28 Thus the risk of scar rupture may be high with induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section scar. 29 In a systematic review of this controversial issue, Vause and Macintosh 30 have estimated that the risk of uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section scar was no greater than 0.6%, similar to that quoted for spontaneous labour. They concluded that uterine scar rupture was such an uncommon event that an impractically large randomised controlled trial would be needed to address the issue properly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A review of eight reports concluded that a positive FFN was associated with significantly shorter delivery intervals than when a negative FFN result is obtained (Kiss et al 2000). Since this assessment can be performed at the bedside, and there is evidence of circadian changes in uterine activity and responses to prostaglandins (Haluska et al 1987, MacKenzie 1987, an assessment of FFN might assist in determining the most appropriate time during the working day when to initiate an induction.…”
Section: Predicting the Success Of Labour Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%