The Clinical Usefulness of the Practice Resource for Driving after Stroke (PReDAS)

Veen, April Vander; Cammarata, Michael J.; Renner, Sarah; Alvarez, Liliana

doi:10.1080/07380577.2021.2018751

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Through a process of critical reflexivity, the first author identified the same assumption-that if health care providers and clients were given appropriate education, driving against medical advice would "naturally" reduce-underlying her own research. In a pilot study, evaluating an occupational therapy practice resource for addressing driving after stroke, clients were provided with detailed information about driving restrictions both verbally and in writing (Vander Veen et al, 2021). At follow-up, the vast majority (90%) of participants recalled instructions provided in acute care.…”

Section: Assumptions and Shortcomings Of An Individualistic Biomedica...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking Driving Against Medical Advice: The Situated Nature of Driving After Stroke

Veen¹,

Rudman²

2022

Can J Occup Ther

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: As stroke can result in functional impairments that impact driving ability, many jurisdictions mandate a 30-day period of driving restriction post-stroke. However, between 26% and 38% of clients drive against medical advice during this period. Purpose: Informed by critical reflexivity of the literature and the first author's practice, this critical analysis paper (1) explicates and critiques how adherence to guidelines regarding driving after stroke in the first 30 days is conceptualized in individualistic, biomedically centred research and (2) argues for expanded understandings of driving based on a transactional occupational perspective. Key Issues: Individualistic, biomedical perspectives view driving against medical advice as an individually located phenomenon, generating partial understandings and individually focused solutions. Re-conceptualizing driving after stroke as a transactional occupational choice provides a productive basis for understanding and addressing driving within practice and research. Implications: Concepts from occupational science can generate new insights for research and client-centred practice regarding driving following stroke.

show abstract

Section: Assumptions and Shortcomings Of An Individualistic Biomedica...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Rethinking Driving Against Medical Advice: The Situated Nature of Driving After Stroke

Veen¹,

Rudman²

2022

Can J Occup Ther

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Factors Influencing the Use of Mobile Applications for Driving Rehabilitation After Stroke: Exploring the Perspectives of Occupational Therapists

Cammarata,

Sangrar,

Harris

et al. 2024

Occupational Therapy In Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lifespace and occupational participation following acquired brain injury during driving disruption: a mixed methods study

Bassingthwaighte,

Gustafsson,

Molineux

2024

Disability and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Clinical Usefulness of the Practice Resource for Driving after Stroke (PReDAS)

Cited by 3 publications

References 25 publications

Rethinking Driving Against Medical Advice: The Situated Nature of Driving After Stroke

Rethinking Driving Against Medical Advice: The Situated Nature of Driving After Stroke

Factors Influencing the Use of Mobile Applications for Driving Rehabilitation After Stroke: Exploring the Perspectives of Occupational Therapists

Lifespace and occupational participation following acquired brain injury during driving disruption: a mixed methods study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About