1966
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.1966.4.5.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Clinical Value of the Glucogram and a New Approach to the Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test

Abstract: The analysis of 197 glucograms is presented and the authors discuss some new points of clinical importance in the appraisal of the diabetic state. The suggestion is also made that when the sulphonylurea test is done, it should follow sequentially an intravenous glucose tolerance test. Further, it was found that in assessing the result of an intravenous glucose tolerance test it is of importance to take into account the blood sampling method, and whether the patient is ambulant or confined to bed. A simplified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They devised a doublelumen catheter (Weller et al, 1960), through one lumen of which blood could be sampled, after it had been anticoagulated by heparin pumped down the other lumen. However, most early workers found it easier either to heparinise the patient or to add anticoagulants after the blood had been sampled (Kawerau and Surtees, 1966). Nonetheless, the method was never widely adopted, due to Paper read at Southern England and South Wales Regional Mcctiog, London, March, 1969. difficulties in sampling; and Professor Butterfield and his colleagues concluded in 1964: 'The precautions needed to prevent blood clotting in the AutoAnalyzer were arduous ... and we recommend frequent sampling rather than continuous monitoring whenever possible' (Butterfield et al, 1964).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They devised a doublelumen catheter (Weller et al, 1960), through one lumen of which blood could be sampled, after it had been anticoagulated by heparin pumped down the other lumen. However, most early workers found it easier either to heparinise the patient or to add anticoagulants after the blood had been sampled (Kawerau and Surtees, 1966). Nonetheless, the method was never widely adopted, due to Paper read at Southern England and South Wales Regional Mcctiog, London, March, 1969. difficulties in sampling; and Professor Butterfield and his colleagues concluded in 1964: 'The precautions needed to prevent blood clotting in the AutoAnalyzer were arduous ... and we recommend frequent sampling rather than continuous monitoring whenever possible' (Butterfield et al, 1964).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%