2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0914-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clinician crowdsourcing challenge: using participatory design to seed implementation strategies

Abstract: Background In healthcare settings, system and organization leaders often control the selection and design of implementation strategies even though frontline workers may have the most intimate understanding of the care delivery process, and factors that optimize and constrain evidence-based practice implementation within the local system. Innovation tournaments, a structured participatory design strategy to crowdsource ideas, are a promising approach to participatory design that may increase the ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(48 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BWS choice experiment was designed to quantify stakeholders' preferences for 14 implementation strategies developed through iterative elicitation, pilot, and pre-testing work completed with members of each stakeholder group in the target population [17,26]. Elicitation of strategies was completed via a system-wide innovation tournament, described elsewhere [27], through which clinicians submitted ideas for strategies to support EBP implementation in Philadelphia. Following the tournament, submitted ideas (N = 65) were analyzed and refined by a team of implementation scientists, behavioral scientists, and clinicians, in order to develop a set of distinct, clearly operationalized implementation strategies with ecological validity for the target system.…”
Section: Study Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BWS choice experiment was designed to quantify stakeholders' preferences for 14 implementation strategies developed through iterative elicitation, pilot, and pre-testing work completed with members of each stakeholder group in the target population [17,26]. Elicitation of strategies was completed via a system-wide innovation tournament, described elsewhere [27], through which clinicians submitted ideas for strategies to support EBP implementation in Philadelphia. Following the tournament, submitted ideas (N = 65) were analyzed and refined by a team of implementation scientists, behavioral scientists, and clinicians, in order to develop a set of distinct, clearly operationalized implementation strategies with ecological validity for the target system.…”
Section: Study Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, there is now a need for research to clarify when, how and why ‘awareness and control of emotions [can] provide
 the initial building blocks for building PsyCap’ (Brunetto et al, 2019), particularly via longitudinal research. Given the challenge of sustaining participant involvement over long periods – especially healthcare personnel – participatory methodologies and research methods might be helpful (Palmer et al, 2019; Stewart et al, 2019). There is also a need for research to clarify how to ‘embed concepts from positive psychology
 into day-to-day practices
 And
 the ‘how’ of implementing a happiness-focussed initiative in aged care’ (Miller et al, 2019).…”
Section: Where To Next?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BWS choice experiment was designed to quantify stakeholders' preferences for 14 implementation strategies developed through iterative elicitation, pilot, and pre-testing work completed with members of each stakeholder group in the target population (17,26). Elicitation of strategies was completed via a system-wide innovation tournament, described elsewhere (27), through which clinicians submitted ideas for strategies to support EBP implementation in Philadelphia. Following the tournament, submitted ideas (N = 65) were analyzed and re ned by a team of implementation scientists, behavioral scientists, and clinicians, in order to develop a set of distinct, clearly operationalized implementation strategies with ecological validity for the target system.…”
Section: Study Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process resulted in a set of 14 implementation strategies (see Table 1: List of Implementation Strategies Included in the BWS Experiment), which were subsequently evaluated in pre-testing interviews with clinicians, supervisors, and administrators (n = 9) within the system to ensure that the strategies, as described, spanned the full range of approaches viewed as relevant by stakeholders and were clearly described. The 14 strategies fell into six categories: (1) nancial incentives, (2) clinical consultation, (3) clinical support tools, (4) clinician social support and networking, (5) clinician performance feedback/social comparison, and (6) client supports (27). Notably, the strategies developed through this process addressed 8 out of 9 categories of implementation strategies identi ed in the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project (18), including: use evaluative and iterative strategies, provide interactive assistance, develop stakeholder interrelationships, train and educate stakeholders, support clinicians, engage consumers, utilize nancial incentives, and change infrastructure.…”
Section: Study Design and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%