2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab1887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The clustering of the SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey quasar sample: testing observational systematics on the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation measurement

Abstract: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations are considered to be a very robust standard ruler against various systematics. This premise has been tested against observational systematics, but not to the level required for the next generation of galaxy surveys such as the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and Euclid. In this paper, we investigate the effect of observational systematics on the BAO measurement of the final sample of quasars from the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 16 in or… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to different systematics, it is still difficult to reliably measure small-scale property-dependent galaxy clustering at the present time. These systematics include redshiftdependent completeness, the missing galaxies in observations (Reid et al 2016;Bianchi & Percival 2017;Bianchi & Verde 2020), the incorrect estimation of the radial selection model (Ross et al 2012;Yang et al 2020), among others (Breton & de la Torre 2021; Farrow et al 2021;Merz et al 2021). Fortunately, the coming big data will considerably reduce random errors in clustering determination, but to reach the high accuracy of clustering analysis required by the next generation surveys, we must eliminate systematic errors in measurement (Beutler et al 2014;Reid et al 2016;Glanville et al 2021;Dávila-Kurbán et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to different systematics, it is still difficult to reliably measure small-scale property-dependent galaxy clustering at the present time. These systematics include redshiftdependent completeness, the missing galaxies in observations (Reid et al 2016;Bianchi & Percival 2017;Bianchi & Verde 2020), the incorrect estimation of the radial selection model (Ross et al 2012;Yang et al 2020), among others (Breton & de la Torre 2021; Farrow et al 2021;Merz et al 2021). Fortunately, the coming big data will considerably reduce random errors in clustering determination, but to reach the high accuracy of clustering analysis required by the next generation surveys, we must eliminate systematic errors in measurement (Beutler et al 2014;Reid et al 2016;Glanville et al 2021;Dávila-Kurbán et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to different systematics, it is still difficult to reliably measure small-scale property-dependent galaxy clustering at the present time. These systematics include redshift-dependent completeness, the missing galaxies in observations (Reid et al 2016;Bianchi & Percival 2017;Bianchi & Verde 2020), the incorrect estimation of the radial selection model (Ross et al 2012; Paper I), among others (Breton & de la Torre 2021;Merz et al 2021;Farrow et al 2021). Fortunately, the coming big data will considerably reduce random errors in clustering determination, but to reach the high accuracy of clustering analysis required by the next-generation surveys, we must eliminate systematic errors in measurement (Beutler et al 2014;Reid et al 2016;Glanville et al 2021;Dávila-Kurbán et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically, the spatial distribution quasars reflects the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAOs, e.g. Zhao et al 2019, for an introduction) and in turn the large-scale structure of the Universe (Dawson et al 2013;Font-Ribera et al 2014;Delubac et al 2015;Alam et al 2021;Merz et al 2021). Expectedly, with the nextgeneration large-scale surveys coming, an unprecedented dataset of QSOs brings an unparalleled opportunity to trigger a revolution in these fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%