2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The co-existence of transcriptional activator and transcriptional repressor MEF2 complexes influences tumor aggressiveness

Abstract: The contribution of MEF2 TFs to the tumorigenic process is still mysterious. Here we clarify that MEF2 can support both pro-oncogenic or tumor suppressive activities depending on the interaction with co-activators or co-repressors partners. Through these interactions MEF2 supervise histone modifications associated with gene activation/repression, such as H3K4 methylation and H3K27 acetylation. Critical switches for the generation of a MEF2 repressive environment are class IIa HDACs. In leiomyosarcomas (LMS), t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(86 reference statements)
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bivalent signature switch at CLL promoters characterized by a loss of the active H3K4me3 mark points to a reduced developmental plasticity of CLL cells. According to our analysis, loss of H3K4me3 is predicted to occur via MEF2 TFs (Aziz et al , ; Di Giorgio et al , ) and reduced KMT2 activity. Furthermore, we find a number of additional links in our core TF network to modifiers of H3K4me3 that included, for example, KMT2E, KDM5A, SETD7 (Appendix Fig S7, Dataset EV14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A bivalent signature switch at CLL promoters characterized by a loss of the active H3K4me3 mark points to a reduced developmental plasticity of CLL cells. According to our analysis, loss of H3K4me3 is predicted to occur via MEF2 TFs (Aziz et al , ; Di Giorgio et al , ) and reduced KMT2 activity. Furthermore, we find a number of additional links in our core TF network to modifiers of H3K4me3 that included, for example, KMT2E, KDM5A, SETD7 (Appendix Fig S7, Dataset EV14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In ~ 1,700 CLL promoters that lost H3K4me3, binding motifs of the MEF2 family of transcriptional activators were enriched (Fig G). The MEF2 family TFs were suggested to regulate H3K4me3 (Pon & Marra, ; Di Giorgio et al , ) also in the context of H3K27me3 (Aziz et al , ). Furthermore, the H3K4‐specific methylases KMT2B (MLL2) and KMT2D (MLL4), and to a lesser degree also KMT2A/C/E, were downregulated in CLL (Fig EV3F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pMXPIE‐Puro HDAC4‐WT/TM, H‐RAS/G12V were obtained by subcloning with a PCR method the ORF into the 4 hydroxy‐tamoxifen (4‐OHT)‐ inducible pMXPIE plasmid (Toledo et al ., ). The plasmids used to silence MEF2D and plasmids encoding for MEF2D‐FLAG and MEF2‐Engrailed FLAG (MEF2‐ENG) were previously described (Di Giorgio et al ., , ). For lentivirus‐based knock‐down, HEK‐293T cells were transfected with 1.8 μg of VSV‐G, 5 μg of Δ8.9 and 8 μg of pLKO plasmids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 36 h at 37°C, virions were collected and opportunely diluted in fresh medium. Retroviral infections were performed as previously described (Di Giorgio et al, 2017).…”
Section: Plasmid Construction Transfections Retroviral Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation